ChallengeThe loop that leaks–Answer
time to read 2 min | 328 words

In my previous post, I asked about the following code and what its output will be:

As it turns out, this code will output two different numbers:

  • On Debug – 134,284,904
  • On Release – 66,896

The behavior is consistent between these two modes.

I was pretty sure that I knew what was going on, but I asked to verify. You can read the GitHub issue if you want the spoiler.

I attached to the running program in WinDBG and issued the following command:

We care about the last line. In particular, we can see that all the memory is indeed in the byte array, as expected.

Next, let’s dump the actual instances that take so much space:

There is one large instance here that we care about, let’s see what is holding on to this fellow, shall we?

It looks like we have a reference from a local variable. Let’s see if we can verify that, shall we? We will use the clrstack command and ask it to give us the parameters and local variables, like so:

The interesting line is 16, which shows:

image

In other words, here is the local variable, and it is set to null. What is going on? And why don’t we see the same behavior on release mode?

As mentioned in the issue, the problem is that the JIT introduce a temporary local variable here, which the GC is obviously aware of, but WinDBG is not. This cause the program to hold on to the value for a longer period of time than expected.

In general, this should only be a problem if you have a long running loop. In fact, we do in some case, and in debug mode, that actually caused our memory utilization to go through the roof and led to this investigation.

In release mode, these temporary variables are rarer (but can still happen, it seems).

Tweet Share Share 3 comments
Tags:

More posts in "Challenge" series:

  1. (06 May 2022) Spot the optimization–solution
  2. (05 May 2022) Spot the optimization
  3. (06 Apr 2022) Why is this code broken?
  4. (16 Dec 2021) Find the slow down–answer
  5. (15 Dec 2021) Find the slow down
  6. (03 Nov 2021) The code review bug that gives me nightmares–The fix
  7. (02 Nov 2021) The code review bug that gives me nightmares–the issue
  8. (01 Nov 2021) The code review bug that gives me nightmares
  9. (16 Jun 2021) Detecting livelihood in a distributed cluster
  10. (21 Apr 2020) Generate matching shard id–answer
  11. (20 Apr 2020) Generate matching shard id
  12. (02 Jan 2020) Spot the bug in the stream
  13. (28 Sep 2018) The loop that leaks–Answer
  14. (27 Sep 2018) The loop that leaks
  15. (03 Apr 2018) The invisible concurrency bug–Answer
  16. (02 Apr 2018) The invisible concurrency bug
  17. (31 Jan 2018) Find the bug in the fix–answer
  18. (30 Jan 2018) Find the bug in the fix
  19. (19 Jan 2017) What does this code do?
  20. (26 Jul 2016) The race condition in the TCP stack, answer
  21. (25 Jul 2016) The race condition in the TCP stack
  22. (28 Apr 2015) What is the meaning of this change?
  23. (26 Sep 2013) Spot the bug
  24. (27 May 2013) The problem of locking down tasks…
  25. (17 Oct 2011) Minimum number of round trips
  26. (23 Aug 2011) Recent Comments with Future Posts
  27. (02 Aug 2011) Modifying execution approaches
  28. (29 Apr 2011) Stop the leaks
  29. (23 Dec 2010) This code should never hit production
  30. (17 Dec 2010) Your own ThreadLocal
  31. (03 Dec 2010) Querying relative information with RavenDB
  32. (29 Jun 2010) Find the bug
  33. (23 Jun 2010) Dynamically dynamic
  34. (28 Apr 2010) What killed the application?
  35. (19 Mar 2010) What does this code do?
  36. (04 Mar 2010) Robust enumeration over external code
  37. (16 Feb 2010) Premature optimization, and all of that…
  38. (12 Feb 2010) Efficient querying
  39. (10 Feb 2010) Find the resource leak
  40. (21 Oct 2009) Can you spot the bug?
  41. (18 Oct 2009) Why is this wrong?
  42. (17 Oct 2009) Write the check in comment
  43. (15 Sep 2009) NH Prof Exporting Reports
  44. (02 Sep 2009) The lazy loaded inheritance many to one association OR/M conundrum
  45. (01 Sep 2009) Why isn’t select broken?
  46. (06 Aug 2009) Find the bug fixes
  47. (26 May 2009) Find the bug
  48. (14 May 2009) multi threaded test failure
  49. (11 May 2009) The regex that doesn’t match
  50. (24 Mar 2009) probability based selection
  51. (13 Mar 2009) C# Rewriting
  52. (18 Feb 2009) write a self extracting program
  53. (04 Sep 2008) Don't stop with the first DSL abstraction
  54. (02 Aug 2008) What is the problem?
  55. (28 Jul 2008) What does this code do?
  56. (26 Jul 2008) Find the bug fix
  57. (05 Jul 2008) Find the deadlock
  58. (03 Jul 2008) Find the bug
  59. (02 Jul 2008) What is wrong with this code
  60. (05 Jun 2008) why did the tests fail?
  61. (27 May 2008) Striving for better syntax
  62. (13 Apr 2008) calling generics without the generic type
  63. (12 Apr 2008) The directory tree
  64. (24 Mar 2008) Find the version
  65. (21 Jan 2008) Strongly typing weakly typed code
  66. (28 Jun 2007) Windsor Null Object Dependency Facility