Properly getting into jailCounting Inmates and other hard problems
In prison, the notion of counting people is sacred. This is probably because the whole point of having a prison is to keep the people you put in there inside, and that means that you count inmates, multiple times a day.
The dirty secret, however, is that you almost never get to that perfect occupancy number, where all the inmates that are registered to a particular block are actually in that block. In most cases, you have at least a few that are outside the block (court dates, medical issues with offsite care, visitations, outside work, etc).
So the key here is not just to count the inmates, but to also account for them. Let’s consider how this will look like in the user interface for counting a couple of cells, shall we?
This works, but it isn’t a good idea. Named counts are usually reserved for the first / last counts of the day. During the day, because it is so frequent to have inmates in and out of their assigned location, you’ll usually do things differently. You’ll have a total count of inmates in the block, and a list of the exceptions. That would look something like this:
You have the number of inmates in the block, how many are expected to be there, the actual count as verified by the sergeant’s signature and the named list of inmates that are not currently in the block. You might have noticed that we are carefully tracking who is responsible for any inmate that it currently out of the block. This is because that matters (for a whole host of legal and cover your ass reasons).
So how would we build such a system?
To start with, we need to talk about the current component or service that we are building. The notion of counting is typically done at the block level, so we’ll start by modeling things there. We’ll have the Block Service, which is in charge of managing anything that is going on inside the block.
A block is composed of:
- Cells, to which inmates are assigned. This is typically an internal division only that has no real business meaning.
- Inmates, which are quite important.
- Staff, which is probably a separate issue entirely, but is quite important for thing such as having enough people at hand to do things like actually run the block.
In terms of the actual operations we need to do, the block is managed by at least a single Sargent per shift and multiple guards. The Sargent is responsible for handling incoming inmates, counting all inmates multiple times a day and other things that we won’t be tracking on a computer system. The guards will mostly interact with the system when they need to check an inmate out for whatever reason (such as taking them to a checkup by a nurse).
With all of this information, we can now model the data we have for a block. Here is the most important document we have, the block’s population. There are a few things here that are worth exploring in the design of the document:
First, we have a separate document per date, recording the state of the block’s population at that time. This is important, because we need to be able to go back in time and track such things. You can also see that the document contains a lot of data that has both the name and id. Why is that?
The information recorded on this document is the data as it was at the time of this document’s creation. Later changes do no apply, by design, since we need to see keep it at the state it was at the time. It might be easier to look at things in code:
The most important thing here is the notion of the Log, which records every incoming and outgoing inmate from the block.
In addition to the daily’s block population document, we also have three to five counting documents, which are built on top of it. These reflect the actual counts made plus the listing of inmates that aren’t currently in the block and why.
And that is quite enough about the prison’s life. This give us sufficient level of details that we can now work with. The next post will talk about how the physical architecture and data flow in the prison.
More posts in "Properly getting into jail" series:
- (19 Mar 2018) The almighty document
- (16 Mar 2018) Data processing
- (15 Mar 2018) My service name in Janet
- (14 Mar 2018) This ain’t what you’re used to
- (12 Mar 2018) Didn’t we already see this warrant?
- (09 Mar 2018) The workflow of getting an inmate released
- (08 Mar 2018) Services with data sharing instead of RPC or messaging
- (07 Mar 2018) The topology of sharing
- (06 Mar 2018) Data flow
- (02 Mar 2018) it’s not a crime to be in an invalid state
- (01 Mar 2018) Physical architecture
- (28 Feb 2018) Counting Inmates and other hard problems
- (27 Feb 2018) Introduction & architecture