+972 52-548-6969
Guess how I found that out...
time to read 1 min | 11 words
Arrgh!
FUTURE POSTS
- Optimizing the cost of clearing a set - 3 days from now
- Scaling HNSW in RavenDB: Optimizing for inadequate hardware - 5 days from now
There are posts all the way to May 14, 2025
RECENT SERIES
-
RavenDB News
(2):
02 May 2025 - May 2025 -
Recording
(15):
30 Apr 2025 - Practical AI Integration with RavenDB -
Production Postmortem
(52):
07 Apr 2025 - The race condition in the interlock -
RavenDB
(13):
02 Apr 2025 - .NET Aspire integration -
RavenDB 7.1
(6):
18 Mar 2025 - One IO Ring to rule them all
RECENT COMMENTS
-
By Samyon Ristov on The null check that didn't check for nulls
-
By Johannes Egger on The null check that didn't check for nulls
-
By riccardo on The null check that didn't check for nulls
-
By Chris B on The null check that didn't check for nulls
-
By Tim on When racing the Heisenbug, code quality goes out the Windows
Syndication
| Main feed | |
| Comments feed |
Comments
Interesting catch
Who has the mistake?
Both can be argued to be correct.
The problem is not that, it is that there is a difference.
So now that the source to the CLR is viewable by the public, how does that impact the mono project and future versions I wonder?
Same as always, if you look at CLR code, please don't contribute to Mono
Mono is correct because it does not use crappy "m_" prefixing for member types. ;)
Shoot! Now that I've glanced at this post, I can't go fix this bug for you! AARGH! My eyes! ;)
Maybe you should have put a spoiler warning on this for any mono devs. I wouldn't be surprised if some were among your readers.
This did not come from the CLR sources. This is a reflector output.
Beside, I frankly doubt that anyone will reveal the secret of PROPERTY GETTERS
@Hanselmen, don't worry the mono team has an official eye bleach for just this sort of situation.
gotta get one of those: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7vqvdwkvJk&NR=1
Good catch :) So what does CheckDisposed() do? throw an exception if the object is disposed?
I ran into a few things like this when working with Mainsoft (which uses Mono source to cross compile to java with their compiler).
By the way, what do you use to create your diagrams?
Firefly,
Yes
Jarrod,
PowerPoint
We only use m_ names when we are forced by something like remoting (which likes to send reflection-based internal field names across the wire).
Otherwise we stay away from that horrible practice.
Miguel
Comment preview