+972 52-548-6969
I am using R# 4.5, and I have to say, for a release that is supposedly all about perf, they managed to squeeze in some really nice new smarts:
Figuring out all the implementations that use or do not use parameters.
Killing off BDD :-)
Markdown turns plain text formatting into fancy HTML formatting.
*italic* **bold**
_italic_ __bold__
Inline:
An [example](http://url.com/ "Title")
Reference-style labels (titles are optional):
An [example][id]. Then, anywhere
else in the doc, define the link:
[id]: http://example.com/ "Title"
Inline (titles are optional):
Reference-style:
![alt text][id]
[id]: /url/to/img.jpg "Title"
Setext-style:
Header 1
========
Header 2
--------
atx-style (closing #'s are optional):
# Header 1 #
## Header 2 ##
###### Header 6
Ordered, without paragraphs:
1. Foo
2. Bar
Unordered, with paragraphs:
* A list item.
With multiple paragraphs.
* Bar
You can nest them:
* Abacus
* answer
* Bubbles
1. bunk
2. bupkis
* BELITTLER
3. burper
* Cunning
> Email-style angle brackets
> are used for blockquotes.
> > And, they can be nested.
> #### Headers in blockquotes
>
> * You can quote a list.
> * Etc.
Three or more dashes or asterisks:
---
* * *
- - - -
End a line with two or more spaces:
Roses are red,
Violets are blue.
Code blocks delimited by 3 or more backticks or tildas:
```
This is a preformatted
code block
```
Set the id of headings with {#<id>} at end of heading line:
## My Heading {#myheading}
Fruit |Color
---------|----------
Apples |Red
Pears |Green
Bananas |YellowTerm 1
: Definition 1
Term 2
: Definition 2Body text with a footnote [^1]
[^1]: Footnote text here
MDD <- will have title
*[MDD]: MarkdownDeep
There are posts all the way to Sep 21, 2017
| Main feed |
|
| Comments feed | |
Comments
Heh, I just ran into that second rule last night, since i also write my tests using the underscore notation. I was torn for a second, since I am well trained by ReSharper to follow their advice, but i think i'll just have to live with blue squigglies in my tests. Unless there is a way to disable rules on a per project basis in the same solution
cool. personally still not on the R# boat though because my only experience installing it messed up all my key bindings and i've been cross with it ever since. I'm a keyboard guy; I can't live without my keybindings being right.
I suppose I should probably try it again.
In the Naming styles, you can configure it to recognize method names with underscores. There are two options: all_lower and First_upper. As far as I can tell, you can't have it recognize one or the other on a class by class basis but you can tell it to recognize both styles (UpperCamelCase and First_upper) globally.
Yeah I noticed the underscore complaints... you can suppress it with a comment:
// ReSharper disable InconsistentNaming
I put that at the top of my specs which does the trick
For suggestions that you don't always like to follow but would still like to know about, you can change the blue squiggly underlines to a smaller, less prominent line that won't be highlighted in the sidebar:
Resharper->Options->->Inspection Severity
Change "Show as hint"
I don't know about earlier versions of Resharper, but with version 4.5, you can have multiple naming convention rules for any given element. For instance, I use both UpperCamelCase (not sure about this rule name) and lower_case conventions for method names to avoid the exact message that you show here, Oren.
Take the suggestion, take it :)
Comment preview