Ayende @ Rahien

Hi!
My name is Oren Eini
Founder of Hibernating Rhinos LTD and RavenDB.
You can reach me by phone or email:

ayende@ayende.com

+972 52-548-6969

, @ Q c

Posts: 6,124 | Comments: 45,471

filter by tags archive

Comments

Arne Claassen

Heh, I just ran into that second rule last night, since i also write my tests using the underscore notation. I was torn for a second, since I am well trained by ReSharper to follow their advice, but i think i'll just have to live with blue squigglies in my tests. Unless there is a way to disable rules on a per project basis in the same solution

josh

cool. personally still not on the R# boat though because my only experience installing it messed up all my key bindings and i've been cross with it ever since. I'm a keyboard guy; I can't live without my keybindings being right.

I suppose I should probably try it again.

Kyle Baley

In the Naming styles, you can configure it to recognize method names with underscores. There are two options: alllower and Firstupper. As far as I can tell, you can't have it recognize one or the other on a class by class basis but you can tell it to recognize both styles (UpperCamelCase and First_upper) globally.

Neil Mosafi

Yeah I noticed the underscore complaints... you can suppress it with a comment:

// ReSharper disable InconsistentNaming

I put that at the top of my specs which does the trick

cbp
cbp

For suggestions that you don't always like to follow but would still like to know about, you can change the blue squiggly underlines to a smaller, less prominent line that won't be highlighted in the sidebar:

Resharper->Options->->Inspection Severity

Change "Show as hint"

wmchristoe

I don't know about earlier versions of Resharper, but with version 4.5, you can have multiple naming convention rules for any given element. For instance, I use both UpperCamelCase (not sure about this rule name) and lower_case conventions for method names to avoid the exact message that you show here, Oren.

Frank Quednau

Take the suggestion, take it :)

Comment preview

Comments have been closed on this topic.

FUTURE POSTS

  1. RavenDB 3.5 whirl wind tour: You want all the data, you can’t handle all the data - about one day from now
  2. The design of RavenDB 4.0: Making Lucene reliable - 3 days from now
  3. RavenDB 3.5 whirl wind tour: I’ll find who is taking my I/O bandwidth and they SHALL pay - 4 days from now
  4. The design of RavenDB 4.0: Physically segregating collections - 5 days from now
  5. RavenDB 3.5 Whirlwind tour: I need to be free to explore my data - 6 days from now

And 14 more posts are pending...

There are posts all the way to May 30, 2016

RECENT SERIES

  1. RavenDB 3.5 whirl wind tour (14):
    29 Apr 2016 - A large cluster goes into a bar and order N^2 drinks
  2. The design of RavenDB 4.0 (13):
    28 Apr 2016 - The implications of the blittable format
  3. Tasks for the new comer (2):
    15 Apr 2016 - Quartz.NET with RavenDB
  4. Code through the looking glass (5):
    18 Mar 2016 - And a linear search to rule them
  5. Find the bug (8):
    29 Feb 2016 - When you can't rely on your own identity
View all series

RECENT COMMENTS

Syndication

Main feed Feed Stats
Comments feed   Comments Feed Stats