Oren Eini

aka Ayende Rahien

Oren Eini

CEO of RavenDB

a NoSQL Open Source Document Database

Get in touch with me:

oren@ravendb.net +972 52-548-6969

Posts: 7,575
|
Comments: 51,188

Copyright ©️ Ayende Rahien 2004 — 2025

Privacy Policy · Terms
filter by tags archive
stack view grid view
  • architecture (606) rss
  • bugs (450) rss
  • challanges (123) rss
  • community (377) rss
  • databases (481) rss
  • design (893) rss
  • development (640) rss
  • hibernating-practices (71) rss
  • miscellaneous (592) rss
  • performance (397) rss
  • programming (1085) rss
  • raven (1442) rss
  • ravendb.net (526) rss
  • reviews (184) rss
  • 2025
    • May (7)
    • April (10)
    • March (10)
    • February (7)
    • January (12)
  • 2024
    • December (3)
    • November (2)
    • October (1)
    • September (3)
    • August (5)
    • July (10)
    • June (4)
    • May (6)
    • April (2)
    • March (8)
    • February (2)
    • January (14)
  • 2023
    • December (4)
    • October (4)
    • September (6)
    • August (12)
    • July (5)
    • June (15)
    • May (3)
    • April (11)
    • March (5)
    • February (5)
    • January (8)
  • 2022
    • December (5)
    • November (7)
    • October (7)
    • September (9)
    • August (10)
    • July (15)
    • June (12)
    • May (9)
    • April (14)
    • March (15)
    • February (13)
    • January (16)
  • 2021
    • December (23)
    • November (20)
    • October (16)
    • September (6)
    • August (16)
    • July (11)
    • June (16)
    • May (4)
    • April (10)
    • March (11)
    • February (15)
    • January (14)
  • 2020
    • December (10)
    • November (13)
    • October (15)
    • September (6)
    • August (9)
    • July (9)
    • June (17)
    • May (15)
    • April (14)
    • March (21)
    • February (16)
    • January (13)
  • 2019
    • December (17)
    • November (14)
    • October (16)
    • September (10)
    • August (8)
    • July (16)
    • June (11)
    • May (13)
    • April (18)
    • March (12)
    • February (19)
    • January (23)
  • 2018
    • December (15)
    • November (14)
    • October (19)
    • September (18)
    • August (23)
    • July (20)
    • June (20)
    • May (23)
    • April (15)
    • March (23)
    • February (19)
    • January (23)
  • 2017
    • December (21)
    • November (24)
    • October (22)
    • September (21)
    • August (23)
    • July (21)
    • June (24)
    • May (21)
    • April (21)
    • March (23)
    • February (20)
    • January (23)
  • 2016
    • December (17)
    • November (18)
    • October (22)
    • September (18)
    • August (23)
    • July (22)
    • June (17)
    • May (24)
    • April (16)
    • March (16)
    • February (21)
    • January (21)
  • 2015
    • December (5)
    • November (10)
    • October (9)
    • September (17)
    • August (20)
    • July (17)
    • June (4)
    • May (12)
    • April (9)
    • March (8)
    • February (25)
    • January (17)
  • 2014
    • December (22)
    • November (19)
    • October (21)
    • September (37)
    • August (24)
    • July (23)
    • June (13)
    • May (19)
    • April (24)
    • March (23)
    • February (21)
    • January (24)
  • 2013
    • December (23)
    • November (29)
    • October (27)
    • September (26)
    • August (24)
    • July (24)
    • June (23)
    • May (25)
    • April (26)
    • March (24)
    • February (24)
    • January (21)
  • 2012
    • December (19)
    • November (22)
    • October (27)
    • September (24)
    • August (30)
    • July (23)
    • June (25)
    • May (23)
    • April (25)
    • March (25)
    • February (28)
    • January (24)
  • 2011
    • December (17)
    • November (14)
    • October (24)
    • September (28)
    • August (27)
    • July (30)
    • June (19)
    • May (16)
    • April (30)
    • March (23)
    • February (11)
    • January (26)
  • 2010
    • December (29)
    • November (28)
    • October (35)
    • September (33)
    • August (44)
    • July (17)
    • June (20)
    • May (53)
    • April (29)
    • March (35)
    • February (33)
    • January (36)
  • 2009
    • December (37)
    • November (35)
    • October (53)
    • September (60)
    • August (66)
    • July (29)
    • June (24)
    • May (52)
    • April (63)
    • March (35)
    • February (53)
    • January (50)
  • 2008
    • December (58)
    • November (65)
    • October (46)
    • September (48)
    • August (96)
    • July (87)
    • June (45)
    • May (51)
    • April (52)
    • March (70)
    • February (43)
    • January (49)
  • 2007
    • December (100)
    • November (52)
    • October (109)
    • September (68)
    • August (80)
    • July (56)
    • June (150)
    • May (115)
    • April (73)
    • March (124)
    • February (102)
    • January (68)
  • 2006
    • December (95)
    • November (53)
    • October (120)
    • September (57)
    • August (88)
    • July (54)
    • June (103)
    • May (89)
    • April (84)
    • March (143)
    • February (78)
    • January (64)
  • 2005
    • December (70)
    • November (97)
    • October (91)
    • September (61)
    • August (74)
    • July (92)
    • June (100)
    • May (53)
    • April (42)
    • March (41)
    • February (84)
    • January (31)
  • 2004
    • December (49)
    • November (26)
    • October (26)
    • September (6)
    • April (10)
RavenDB Workshops - Deep dive into practical use of Document Data Modeling
  previous post next post  
May 23 2008

Resharper 4.0 in now in beta

time to read 1 min | 34 words

Just got the email about it. ReSharper 4.0 moved to a beta status. You can find the details here.

Personally, I have been using a fairly old build, with relatively few problems.

Tweet Share Share 19 comments
Tags:
  • Programming

  previous post next post  

Comments

Eric Hauser
23 May 2008
01:40 AM
Eric Hauser

You should definately get the latest. Starting with the one they labeled release candidate I have noticed a significant speed increase over the other nightly drops.

Petar Repac
23 May 2008
06:24 AM
Petar Repac

My team is looking for ways of increasing productivity.

Could you or others give some estimation of productivity gain when using Resharper compared to using plain VS2008 ?

Thanks in advance.

Petar

Ayende Rahien
23 May 2008
07:32 AM
Ayende Rahien

351.54% productivity increase.

Ilya Ryzhenkov
23 May 2008
08:52 AM
Ilya Ryzhenkov

They counted it here: http://blog.noop.se/2008/05/22/ReSharper+40+Beta+Is+Out.aspx

So for that case, the number is something like 326%

However, if we add live templates, create from usage, extract method refactoring, the number could be something like 400% or more.

Petar Repac
23 May 2008
09:29 AM
Petar Repac

351.54% productivity increase.

So you went to sleep and in the morning R# finished the project ?

:))

Petar Repac
23 May 2008
11:56 AM
Petar Repac

Joking aside, how did you get the 351.54 % ?

t800t8
23 May 2008
12:55 PM
t800t8

I guess Oren calculated from the number of characters you need to type.

Alex Simkin
23 May 2008
13:18 PM
Alex Simkin

VB.NET 9.0 programmers can ignore this announcement.

Petar Repac
23 May 2008
13:29 PM
Petar Repac

t800t8,

My guess would be that R# keeps this statistic and shows it on demand.

Louis
23 May 2008
13:50 PM
Louis

Or he could have pulled an absurdly precise number out of thin air as a zen way of highlighting out the impossibility of deriving such a distilled quantification that has any meaning.

Meowth
23 May 2008
13:56 PM
Meowth

I don't believe in such precise numbers. I hope this is not more than funny - to put such qualified numbers.

BTW, how do you think how much MS can pay and will to Re# team to incorporate their work into VS.vNEXT? =)

Petar Repac
23 May 2008
14:02 PM
Petar Repac

Luis,

Yes, I also was under impression that Oren was a little sarcastic.

Anyway I wasn't looking for some precise number, but for general feedback in productivity gain from developers that use R#.

Regards, Petar

paul
23 May 2008
17:08 PM
paul

where is the jetbrains ide

Marcin Seredynski
24 May 2008
02:25 AM
Marcin Seredynski

Petar, remember that 83.27% of the statistics are made up on the spot ;). Although R# is a great tool and saves a lot of typing, majority of the work happens inside the developer's head. Productivity boost comes from a responsive environment that does not get into your way - R# is pretty good at making a good code editor out of VS2008. Ideally, I would like to have R# for Notepad++, to get faster load times :)

Lucas Goodwin
25 May 2008
03:51 AM
Lucas Goodwin

I've seen atleast 3 times the increase in productivity in terms of refactoring operations. Move and Rename are unbelievably time saving.

The other gains I've experienced have been more due to how well R# supports the TDD process via it's tooling. Auto-creation of methods, classes, etc. Saves a good deal of time and allows me to focus more on the design aspect of TDD.

Ulu
25 May 2008
10:29 AM
Ulu

Alex: don't they have a separate VB edition?

By the way, has anybody worked with DevExpress' CodeRush? How does it compare to R#?

Petar Repac
25 May 2008
17:53 PM
Petar Repac

Ulu,

As I understand it CodeRush is code generation tool so it shouldn't be compared with Resharper.

DevExpress has Refactor! Pro and it is more suited to be compared with Resharper.

Mats Helander
26 May 2008
11:50 AM
Mats Helander

http://martinfowler.com/bliki/CannotMeasureProductivity.html

I find that the productivity raiser in tools like resharper has a lot to do with how they help you deal with mistakes (think: rename). This means that a coder who makes a lot of mistakes may see a greater productivity increase.

In other words, your devs may not become that much more productive with Re#. If you hired me, otoh, you could probably see something like a 5000% productivity improvement. Of course, I would charge a premium rate for such amazing productivity increasing potential! ;-)

/Mats

Ulu
28 May 2008
07:30 AM
Ulu

So, anybody tried Refactor! Pro? Their list of refactorings looks pretty impressive..

Comment preview

Comments have been closed on this topic.

Markdown formatting

ESC to close

Markdown turns plain text formatting into fancy HTML formatting.

Phrase Emphasis

*italic*   **bold**
_italic_   __bold__

Links

Inline:

An [example](http://url.com/ "Title")

Reference-style labels (titles are optional):

An [example][id]. Then, anywhere
else in the doc, define the link:
  [id]: http://example.com/  "Title"

Images

Inline (titles are optional):

![alt text](/path/img.jpg "Title")

Reference-style:

![alt text][id]
[id]: /url/to/img.jpg "Title"

Headers

Setext-style:

Header 1
========
Header 2
--------

atx-style (closing #'s are optional):

# Header 1 #
## Header 2 ##
###### Header 6

Lists

Ordered, without paragraphs:

1.  Foo
2.  Bar

Unordered, with paragraphs:

*   A list item.
    With multiple paragraphs.
*   Bar

You can nest them:

*   Abacus
    * answer
*   Bubbles
    1.  bunk
    2.  bupkis
        * BELITTLER
    3. burper
*   Cunning

Blockquotes

> Email-style angle brackets
> are used for blockquotes.
> > And, they can be nested.
> #### Headers in blockquotes
> 
> * You can quote a list.
> * Etc.

Horizontal Rules

Three or more dashes or asterisks:

---
* * *
- - - - 

Manual Line Breaks

End a line with two or more spaces:

Roses are red,   
Violets are blue.

Fenced Code Blocks

Code blocks delimited by 3 or more backticks or tildas:

```
This is a preformatted
code block
```

Header IDs

Set the id of headings with {#<id>} at end of heading line:

## My Heading {#myheading}

Tables

Fruit    |Color
---------|----------
Apples   |Red
Pears	 |Green
Bananas  |Yellow

Definition Lists

Term 1
: Definition 1
Term 2
: Definition 2

Footnotes

Body text with a footnote [^1]
[^1]: Footnote text here

Abbreviations

MDD <- will have title
*[MDD]: MarkdownDeep

 

FUTURE POSTS

  1. Optimizing the cost of clearing a set - 3 days from now
  2. Scaling HNSW in RavenDB: Optimizing for inadequate hardware - 5 days from now

There are posts all the way to May 14, 2025

RECENT SERIES

  1. RavenDB News (2):
    02 May 2025 - May 2025
  2. Recording (15):
    30 Apr 2025 - Practical AI Integration with RavenDB
  3. Production Postmortem (52):
    07 Apr 2025 - The race condition in the interlock
  4. RavenDB (13):
    02 Apr 2025 - .NET Aspire integration
  5. RavenDB 7.1 (6):
    18 Mar 2025 - One IO Ring to rule them all
View all series

RECENT COMMENTS

  • But in case you have nullability checks enabled (i.e. `<Nullable>enable</Nullable>`), then you'll have a compiler warning on ...
    By Samyon Ristov on The null check that didn't check for nulls
  • Grok wasn't *wrong*. It only said that `_items` can't be null for the condition to evaluate to `true`, but didn't say anythi...
    By Johannes Egger on The null check that didn't check for nulls
  • When I started enabling NRT, I remember I was initially confused when all variables (for reference types) declared with `var`...
    By riccardo on The null check that didn't check for nulls
  • That is surprising - I think of var as a shorthand that does not affect the final result of the compilation. I wouldn't expec...
    By Chris B on The null check that didn't check for nulls
  • "It is also about as friendly as a monkey with a sore tooth and an alcohol addiction." And I have to clean my monitor.
    By Tim on When racing the Heisenbug, code quality goes out the Windows

Syndication

Main feed Feed Stats
Comments feed   Comments Feed Stats
}