+972 52-548-6969
Just got the email about it. ReSharper 4.0 moved to a beta status. You can find the details here.
Personally, I have been using a fairly old build, with relatively few problems.
Markdown turns plain text formatting into fancy HTML formatting.
*italic* **bold**
_italic_ __bold__
Inline:
An [example](http://url.com/ "Title")
Reference-style labels (titles are optional):
An [example][id]. Then, anywhere
else in the doc, define the link:
[id]: http://example.com/ "Title"
Inline (titles are optional):
Reference-style:
![alt text][id]
[id]: /url/to/img.jpg "Title"
Setext-style:
Header 1
========
Header 2
--------
atx-style (closing #'s are optional):
# Header 1 #
## Header 2 ##
###### Header 6
Ordered, without paragraphs:
1. Foo
2. Bar
Unordered, with paragraphs:
* A list item.
With multiple paragraphs.
* Bar
You can nest them:
* Abacus
* answer
* Bubbles
1. bunk
2. bupkis
* BELITTLER
3. burper
* Cunning
> Email-style angle brackets
> are used for blockquotes.
> > And, they can be nested.
> #### Headers in blockquotes
>
> * You can quote a list.
> * Etc.
Three or more dashes or asterisks:
---
* * *
- - - -
End a line with two or more spaces:
Roses are red,
Violets are blue.
Code blocks delimited by 3 or more backticks or tildas:
```
This is a preformatted
code block
```
Set the id of headings with {#<id>} at end of heading line:
## My Heading {#myheading}
Fruit |Color
---------|----------
Apples |Red
Pears |Green
Bananas |YellowTerm 1
: Definition 1
Term 2
: Definition 2Body text with a footnote [^1]
[^1]: Footnote text here
MDD <- will have title
*[MDD]: MarkdownDeep
And 2 more posts are pending...
There are posts all the way to Jul 04, 2017
| Main feed |
|
| Comments feed | |
Comments
You should definately get the latest. Starting with the one they labeled release candidate I have noticed a significant speed increase over the other nightly drops.
My team is looking for ways of increasing productivity.
Could you or others give some estimation of productivity gain when using Resharper compared to using plain VS2008 ?
Thanks in advance.
Petar
351.54% productivity increase.
They counted it here: http://blog.noop.se/2008/05/22/ReSharper+40+Beta+Is+Out.aspx
So for that case, the number is something like 326%
However, if we add live templates, create from usage, extract method refactoring, the number could be something like 400% or more.
So you went to sleep and in the morning R# finished the project ?
:))
Joking aside, how did you get the 351.54 % ?
I guess Oren calculated from the number of characters you need to type.
VB.NET 9.0 programmers can ignore this announcement.
t800t8,
My guess would be that R# keeps this statistic and shows it on demand.
Or he could have pulled an absurdly precise number out of thin air as a zen way of highlighting out the impossibility of deriving such a distilled quantification that has any meaning.
I don't believe in such precise numbers. I hope this is not more than funny - to put such qualified numbers.
BTW, how do you think how much MS can pay and will to Re# team to incorporate their work into VS.vNEXT? =)
Luis,
Yes, I also was under impression that Oren was a little sarcastic.
Anyway I wasn't looking for some precise number, but for general feedback in productivity gain from developers that use R#.
Regards, Petar
where is the jetbrains ide
Petar, remember that 83.27% of the statistics are made up on the spot ;). Although R# is a great tool and saves a lot of typing, majority of the work happens inside the developer's head. Productivity boost comes from a responsive environment that does not get into your way - R# is pretty good at making a good code editor out of VS2008. Ideally, I would like to have R# for Notepad++, to get faster load times :)
I've seen atleast 3 times the increase in productivity in terms of refactoring operations. Move and Rename are unbelievably time saving.
The other gains I've experienced have been more due to how well R# supports the TDD process via it's tooling. Auto-creation of methods, classes, etc. Saves a good deal of time and allows me to focus more on the design aspect of TDD.
Alex: don't they have a separate VB edition?
By the way, has anybody worked with DevExpress' CodeRush? How does it compare to R#?
Ulu,
As I understand it CodeRush is code generation tool so it shouldn't be compared with Resharper.
DevExpress has Refactor! Pro and it is more suited to be compared with Resharper.
http://martinfowler.com/bliki/CannotMeasureProductivity.html
I find that the productivity raiser in tools like resharper has a lot to do with how they help you deal with mistakes (think: rename). This means that a coder who makes a lot of mistakes may see a greater productivity increase.
In other words, your devs may not become that much more productive with Re#. If you hired me, otoh, you could probably see something like a 5000% productivity improvement. Of course, I would charge a premium rate for such amazing productivity increasing potential! ;-)
/Mats
So, anybody tried Refactor! Pro? Their list of refactorings looks pretty impressive..
Comment preview