Ayende @ Rahien

My name is Oren Eini
Founder of Hibernating Rhinos LTD and RavenDB.
You can reach me by phone or email:


+972 52-548-6969

, @ Q c

Posts: 6,128 | Comments: 45,546

filter by tags archive

Is Linq For Mortals?

time to read 2 min | 228 words

Mike Taulty has posted about Linq syntax, at the end, he shows a simple way to do joins and then aggregation between two collections. The code looks like this:

var a = products.Join(
        p => p.Id,
        s => s.ProductId,
      (p,s) => new { Country=s.Country, Sales=s.Sales, Product=p.Name })
.GroupBy( p => new { p.Country, p.Product })
.Select( gp => new { gp.Key, TotalSales = gp.Sum(s => s.Sales) });

I am sorry, but I cant read this. I can't even understand what this is meant to do. Now, I am the first to admit that my knowledge of Linq is weak at best, but still... Assume that I have a bug in such a code, how do I debug it?

That is a much bigger concern to me, I am not worried about learning the new stuff, I am worried about what I need to do when they break. I have some experiance in debugging applications via Reflector, and that is not nice. Especially if the compiler is doing funky magic and you are left reading the IL.



@ayende re luke

a linq query analyzer with F5 simplicity to make the cycle similarly quick, seems feasible though - doesn't it? (real question, I'm probably forgetting something)

Ayende Rahien

Not easily, no.

You would need to import all the referenced assemblies, etc.

It is possible, just not trivial.

Most so because often enough what would happen is the query won't run in memory but translated to some other form (SQL, XPath), which may cause wildly different results

Luke Breuer


Perhaps one could do some IL munging to get the results set after each extension method call? I assume you are familiar with how LINQ syntactic sugar gets converted to a string of method calls?

Ayende Rahien

Yes, I know how it is translated, it is just that this is getting scary.

IL Munging is not for the faint of heart, and getting it wrong can be very confusing.

I wonder what the debugger guys are working on now.

Luke Breuer

The IL munging only needs to be done once if it is done well.

Comment preview

Comments have been closed on this topic.


  1. The low level interview question - 11 hours from now
  2. The worker pattern - 3 days from now

There are posts all the way to May 30, 2016


  1. The design of RavenDB 4.0 (14):
    26 May 2016 - The client side
  2. RavenDB 3.5 whirl wind tour (14):
    25 May 2016 - Got anything to declare, ya smuggler?
  3. Tasks for the new comer (2):
    15 Apr 2016 - Quartz.NET with RavenDB
  4. Code through the looking glass (5):
    18 Mar 2016 - And a linear search to rule them
  5. Find the bug (8):
    29 Feb 2016 - When you can't rely on your own identity
View all series



Main feed Feed Stats
Comments feed   Comments Feed Stats