+972 52-548-6969
I mentioned that I got into some problems with MSMQ that I couldn’t reproduce later on. Well, here is the actual code that I am running that is causing a hung. As you can see, this is really strange.
Markdown turns plain text formatting into fancy HTML formatting.
*italic* **bold**
_italic_ __bold__
Inline:
An [example](http://url.com/ "Title")
Reference-style labels (titles are optional):
An [example][id]. Then, anywhere
else in the doc, define the link:
[id]: http://example.com/ "Title"
Inline (titles are optional):
Reference-style:
![alt text][id]
[id]: /url/to/img.jpg "Title"
Setext-style:
Header 1
========
Header 2
--------
atx-style (closing #'s are optional):
# Header 1 #
## Header 2 ##
###### Header 6
Ordered, without paragraphs:
1. Foo
2. Bar
Unordered, with paragraphs:
* A list item.
With multiple paragraphs.
* Bar
You can nest them:
* Abacus
* answer
* Bubbles
1. bunk
2. bupkis
* BELITTLER
3. burper
* Cunning
> Email-style angle brackets
> are used for blockquotes.
> > And, they can be nested.
> #### Headers in blockquotes
>
> * You can quote a list.
> * Etc.
Three or more dashes or asterisks:
---
* * *
- - - -
End a line with two or more spaces:
Roses are red,
Violets are blue.
Code blocks delimited by 3 or more backticks or tildas:
```
This is a preformatted
code block
```
Set the id of headings with {#<id>} at end of heading line:
## My Heading {#myheading}
Fruit |Color
---------|----------
Apples |Red
Pears |Green
Bananas |YellowTerm 1
: Definition 1
Term 2
: Definition 2Body text with a footnote [^1]
[^1]: Footnote text here
MDD <- will have title
*[MDD]: MarkdownDeep
And 3 more posts are pending...
There are posts all the way to Aug 02, 2017
| Main feed |
|
| Comments feed | |
Comments
With identical code I get
test_queue2
CompletedSynchronously: False
IsCompleted: False
Wait completed : False
test_queue
CompletedSynchronously: False
IsCompleted: False
Wait completed : False
sorry, missed to the comment about "messages in queue2". Too late... Same result as you.
Erm, according to MSDN,
BeginPeek() Initiates an asynchronous peek operation that has no time-out. The operation is not complete until a message becomes available in the queue.
So when there are no messages, the peek would never complete. What am I missing?
The queue.Dispose()
It's not good practice to reuse an object after it's disposed, right? I'm sure examples like this exist all over the BCL; especially cases where one is using BeginXXX after disposal.
I also had weird problems with MSMQ, but the problems only happened when I was using the async functions/events. I found them to be pretty unreliable - especially when failures occured. Things would just stop working - no reason, no exception, the thread would simply die. It was so inconsistent, that I ended up just polling on my own threads.
Comment preview