NH ProfWhy you should use it
time to read 1 min | 51 words
More posts in "NH Prof" series:
- (09 Dec 2010) Alert on bad ‘like’ query
- (10 Dec 2009) Filter static files
- (16 Nov 2009) Exporting Reports
- (08 Oct 2009) NHibernate Search Integration
- (19 Aug 2009) Multiple Session Factory Support
- (07 Aug 2009) Diffing Sessions
- (06 Aug 2009) Capturing DDL
- (05 Aug 2009) Detect Cross Thread Session Usage
- (22 May 2009) Detecting 2nd cache collection loads
- (15 May 2009) Error Detection
- (12 May 2009) Queries by Url
- (04 Feb 2009) View Query Results
- (18 Jan 2009) Superfluous <many-to-one> update
- (18 Jan 2009) URL tracking
- (10 Jan 2009) Detecting distributed transactions (System.Transactions)
- (06 Jan 2009) The Query Cache
- (05 Jan 2009) Query Duration
- (24 Dec 2008) Unbounded result sets
- (24 Dec 2008) Row Counts
Comments
4 minutes was not enough to understand that something should be studied more deeper ?
More than 6 alerts per entity? Amazing...
I believe this qualifies as "studying deeper"
A picture is worth a thousand words...
..and you seem too selfish, which is more that a thousand words indeed.
isn't Select N+1 when you select entity after entity, each in its own query?
Then how can you have 890 select N+1s with only 501 entities loaded?
Also, why would there be a large number of individual writes for a select?
Maybe it's because I don't know NH or NHProf, but I don't think I understand this picture fully.
@configurator:
Select n+1 means you're executing the same select statement several times in a session, selects that probably return the same entities. So nothing wrong with the screenshot. Also in the same session he is doing some updates.
This is exactly what my experience was with using NHProf, although less severe. Usually it's not hard to figure out what's happening (or at least get a gut feeling), but with NHProf it's so easy to spot the errors! I was hesitant at first, but when the possibility to use it for Java Hibernate seemed to be possible I was sold ;-)
One step forward, two back.. (i.e. One db call, for every 2 alerts) something wrong with this picture. (1735/3534)
Comment preview