Ayende @ Rahien

Hi!
My name is Oren Eini
Founder of Hibernating Rhinos LTD and RavenDB.
You can reach me by phone or email:

ayende@ayende.com

+972 52-548-6969

, @ Q c

Posts: 5,969 | Comments: 44,492

filter by tags archive

ChallengeFind the bug fix


Usually I tend to pose bugs as the challenges, and not the bug fixes, but this is an interesting one. Take a look at the following code:

var handles = new List<WaitHandle>();
using (
	var stream = new FileStream(path, FileMode.CreateNew, FileAccess.Write, FileShare.None, 0x1000,
								 FileOptions.Asynchronous))
{
	for (int i = 0; i < 64; i++)
	{
		var handle = new ManualResetEvent(false);
		var bytes = Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes( i + Environment.NewLine);
		stream.BeginWrite(bytes, 0, bytes.Length, delegate(IAsyncResult ar)
		{
			stream.EndWrite(ar);
			handle.Set();
		}, stream);
		handles.Add(handle);
	}
	WaitHandle.WaitAll(handles.ToArray());
	stream.Flush();

}

Now, tell me why I am creating a ManualResetEvent manually, instead of using the one that BeginWrite IAsyncResult will return?

More posts in "Challenge" series:

  1. (28 Apr 2015) What is the meaning of this change?
  2. (26 Sep 2013) Spot the bug
  3. (27 May 2013) The problem of locking down tasks…
  4. (17 Oct 2011) Minimum number of round trips
  5. (23 Aug 2011) Recent Comments with Future Posts
  6. (02 Aug 2011) Modifying execution approaches
  7. (29 Apr 2011) Stop the leaks
  8. (23 Dec 2010) This code should never hit production
  9. (17 Dec 2010) Your own ThreadLocal
  10. (03 Dec 2010) Querying relative information with RavenDB
  11. (29 Jun 2010) Find the bug
  12. (23 Jun 2010) Dynamically dynamic
  13. (28 Apr 2010) What killed the application?
  14. (19 Mar 2010) What does this code do?
  15. (04 Mar 2010) Robust enumeration over external code
  16. (16 Feb 2010) Premature optimization, and all of that…
  17. (12 Feb 2010) Efficient querying
  18. (10 Feb 2010) Find the resource leak
  19. (21 Oct 2009) Can you spot the bug?
  20. (18 Oct 2009) Why is this wrong?
  21. (17 Oct 2009) Write the check in comment
  22. (15 Sep 2009) NH Prof Exporting Reports
  23. (02 Sep 2009) The lazy loaded inheritance many to one association OR/M conundrum
  24. (01 Sep 2009) Why isn’t select broken?
  25. (06 Aug 2009) Find the bug fixes
  26. (26 May 2009) Find the bug
  27. (14 May 2009) multi threaded test failure
  28. (11 May 2009) The regex that doesn’t match
  29. (24 Mar 2009) probability based selection
  30. (13 Mar 2009) C# Rewriting
  31. (18 Feb 2009) write a self extracting program
  32. (04 Sep 2008) Don't stop with the first DSL abstraction
  33. (02 Aug 2008) What is the problem?
  34. (28 Jul 2008) What does this code do?
  35. (26 Jul 2008) Find the bug fix
  36. (05 Jul 2008) Find the deadlock
  37. (03 Jul 2008) Find the bug
  38. (02 Jul 2008) What is wrong with this code
  39. (05 Jun 2008) why did the tests fail?
  40. (27 May 2008) Striving for better syntax
  41. (13 Apr 2008) calling generics without the generic type
  42. (12 Apr 2008) The directory tree
  43. (24 Mar 2008) Find the version
  44. (21 Jan 2008) Strongly typing weakly typed code
  45. (28 Jun 2007) Windsor Null Object Dependency Facility

Comments

Jo&#227;o Bragan&#231;a

Is it because there are not enough ThreadPool threads (i think it defaults to 25 per cpu)?

Ayende Rahien

No, that is not an issue, they will simply execute in batches of 25

Scott MacLellan

Is it because of the order in which their event fires? For example, it will fire prior to the end actually occuring. It could also be that their reset event is configured differently than the one you are making, i.e. maybe their reset event is actually and AutoResentEvent.

Ayende Rahien

There is relation to ordering, but not in the way you are thinking about it

Thomas Krause

stream.EndWrite() probably disposes the WaitHandle which causes WaitAll to fail.

Ayende Rahien

Thomas,

Exactly.

But to make matters worse, it will only happen in async mode!

C.J. Anderson

Very subtle.

The WaitHandle returned by IAsyncResult from the async write only "needs" to live until EndWrite is called. Calling WaitAll can potentially throw an ObjectDisposedException if the handle is closed.

The calling set on the manually created handle does not release the handle for GC.

C.J. Anderson

oops. someone got a correct answer in before I posted. mea culpa.

Comment preview

Comments have been closed on this topic.

FUTURE POSTS

No future posts left, oh my!

RECENT SERIES

  1. Production postmortem (5):
    29 Jul 2015 - The evil licensing code
  2. Career planning (6):
    24 Jul 2015 - The immortal choices aren't
  3. API Design (7):
    20 Jul 2015 - We’ll let the users sort it out
  4. What is new in RavenDB 3.5 (3):
    15 Jul 2015 - Exploring data in the dark
  5. The RavenDB Comic Strip (3):
    28 May 2015 - Part III – High availability & sleeping soundly
View all series

RECENT COMMENTS

Syndication

Main feed Feed Stats
Comments feed   Comments Feed Stats