Ayende @ Rahien

Hi!
My name is Ayende Rahien
Founder of Hibernating Rhinos LTD and RavenDB.
You can reach me by phone or email:

ayende@ayende.com

+972 52-548-6969

@

Posts: 5,947 | Comments: 44,540

filter by tags archive

MSDN vs. Google


Here is a small experiment, I want to read the documentation for IDispatchMessageInspector

Just to give an idea, here is the wget output for this address:

wget http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.servicemodel.dispatcher.idispatchmessageinspector.aspx
--00:59:48--  http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.servicemodel.dispatcher.idispatchmessageinspector.aspx
           => `system.servicemodel.dispatcher.idispatchmessageinspector.aspx'
Resolving msdn2.microsoft.com... 207.46.16.251
Connecting to msdn2.microsoft.com|207.46.16.251|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 122,022 (119K) [text/html]

100%[========================================================>] 122,022        5.74K/s    ETA 00:00

01:00:12 (5.74 KB/s) - `system.servicemodel.dispatcher.idispatchmessageinspector.aspx' saved [122022/122022]

That is right, over a minute half a minute to download just the HTML content of a single page, over two minutes just to get the simplest page to load.

Let me contrast that with the comparable experience:

  • Go to google.com
    Load time: faster than I can measure
  • Put IDispatchMessageInspector and hit enter
    Load time: ~2 Seconds
  • Go to the first result's cached content
    Load time: ~7 seconds

You know what the real sad part is? The google approach is faster than locally installed MSDN!


Comments

Luke Breuer

What are your computer's specs? I think local MSDN takes < 5 seconds from a cold start on mine: Raptor 10K 150GB, Core2 2.66GHz, 4GB DDR2.

I do agree that online MSDN is horribly slow, although not nearly as slow as you have noted. I'm guessing I'm a lot closer to the closest MSDN server than you are.

Grimace of Despair

At the local DevDays, I recently asked Ingo Rammer if he had any idea why the MSDN site has (always?) been so painfully slow, knowing it's MS window to developers. You might want to show to (potential) users that your technology works, don't you? He couldn't come up with anything either but "probably no priority".

For me, it's a big showstopper. I sometimes find myself not wading through MSDN just because I know I will be spending minutes on searching just a small feature. Long live Google cache!

Luke Breuer

To be honest, I pity anyone not using a lightening fast machine with VS2005 or client MSDN. With a top-flight machine, VS2005 is pretty decent. Without... convert to Linux. :-p

Rachit

Sooo much agreed. MSDN2 is definitely dog slow. Especially, when it tries to load the left side navigational Tree. Takes forever... Google definitely returns better results.

mawi

Right on!! I've thought the same thing!

A lot of people are missing the bit about google beating LOCAL MSDN search as well. Embarrasing to MS and freakin annoying to us devs.

Pavel Chuchuva

Google MSDN search:

http://www.google.com/coop/cse?cx=001706605492879182808%3Ayra97xpb_7y

Comment preview

Comments have been closed on this topic.

FUTURE POSTS

No future posts left, oh my!

RECENT SERIES

  1. RavenDB Sharding (2):
    21 May 2015 - Adding a new shard to an existing cluster, the easy way
  2. The RavenDB Comic Strip (2):
    20 May 2015 - Part II – a team in trouble!
  3. Challenge (45):
    28 Apr 2015 - What is the meaning of this change?
  4. Interview question (2):
    30 Mar 2015 - fix the index
  5. Excerpts from the RavenDB Performance team report (20):
    20 Feb 2015 - Optimizing Compare – The circle of life (a post-mortem)
View all series

RECENT COMMENTS

Syndication

Main feed Feed Stats
Comments feed   Comments Feed Stats