+972 52-548-6969
Google vs. Bing
time to read 1 min | 92 words
I was trying to find my office in Google’s Maps:
And then I tried Bing’s Maps:
Dear Microsoft, there is a good reason why you are less successful than Google…
FUTURE POSTS
- NOT Sharding RavenDB Vector Search - about one hour from now
- Optimizing the cost of clearing a set - 3 days from now
- Scaling HNSW in RavenDB: Optimizing for inadequate hardware - 5 days from now
There are posts all the way to May 14, 2025
RECENT SERIES
-
RavenDB News
(2):
02 May 2025 - May 2025 -
Recording
(15):
30 Apr 2025 - Practical AI Integration with RavenDB -
Production Postmortem
(52):
07 Apr 2025 - The race condition in the interlock -
RavenDB
(13):
02 Apr 2025 - .NET Aspire integration -
RavenDB 7.1
(6):
18 Mar 2025 - One IO Ring to rule them all
RECENT COMMENTS
-
By Samyon Ristov on The null check that didn't check for nulls
-
By Johannes Egger on The null check that didn't check for nulls
-
By riccardo on The null check that didn't check for nulls
-
By Chris B on The null check that didn't check for nulls
-
By Tim on When racing the Heisenbug, code quality goes out the Windows
Syndication
| Main feed | |
| Comments feed |
Comments
The search function is indeed appalling, but the "Bird's eye" view is awesome. It shows the location as photographed from satellite.
The feature is not available averywhere, though.
Wow, that surprises me. I've usually found Bing maps to be more up-to-date than Google's (especially around newer housing communities and such). But perhaps that is only here in the US?
Bing works better in my case, but google is at least suggesting the real address as possible solution
smnbss.wordpress.com/2011/01/07/google-vs-bing/
The difference is that MS has a guaranteed revenue stream from OS and office. They can plod along bleeding on the web for decades until they either hit it or not. They have absolutely no urgency in this game.
By the way, there is a guy who obssesses over these comparsons: http://www.41latitude.com though he's been quiet for a few months.
@smnbss: Odd, Google works great for me and I'm literally down the road from you...
http://i51.tinypic.com/2qjzp7l.png
I didn't even notice all of Bing's suggestions are way off-course as well...
@peter,
So because the OS department makes money, the guys who do Bing are lazy? Not likely.
The Kinect has been a runaway success so far (destroying Sony's Move at this point) and it innovative as all hell.
@Steve
I am not really bashing MS, we are a microsoft shop and make our living through them. My point is that we should expect this type of thing since the bing guys will be funded for another ten years even if they don't innovate "as all hell" but merely "in all moderation". The xbox took about 7-8 years to turn a profit, I think.
In any case it may only take one stumble by google in ad-space to "lose" to ms, since that is their life blood, and it is not locked in like the os-office scenario.
In my experience, everything good about 'Bing' works really well inside the USA, and is half arsed outside of it.
@Chad: You might be right; I'm in the UK, and in my experience, everything good about 'Bing' is:
This problem is because of copy right issues with the Israeli maps.
Yehuda,
Hard to believe it, Google solved it, so Bing should too
@peter,
Got to completely disagree here. Take a look at how quickly Balmer pulled the plug on the Kin since it wasn't performing. The guys on the Bing team have been tasked with "beating" Google at their own game, while they aren't even close yet, I doubt that they're just sitting back with their feet up taking it easy. Let's also not forget just how much money the boys in Redmond are paying to advertise Bing (from product placements in TV shows to expensive commercials during NFL football games), Balmer is not going to be content with just cruising a long for the next decade.
Google is incredibly good at what they do, so it's no crime that they haven't caught up yet.
Comment preview