﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Ayende @ Rahien</title><link>http://ayende.com</link><description>Ayende @ Rahien</description><copyright>Copyright (C) Ayende Rahien  2004 - 2021 (c) 2026</copyright><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>Adam commented on Reviewing SignalR&amp;ndash;Part I</title><description>lol @ poo</description><link>http://ayende.com/92161/reviewing-signalr-part-i#comment2</link><guid>http://ayende.com/92161/reviewing-signalr-part-i#comment2</guid><pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 15:36:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Scott Hanselman commented on Reviewing SignalR&amp;ndash;Part I</title><description>That's David Fowler and Damian Edwards' decisions, far be it from me to take credit for their good works.

But, yes, it's a high level API that lets you directly call client-side JavaScript from the server-side, based on both sides having the same method name. You could have called received "poo" and then clients.poo if you like. It's using unknown methods as a dispatching mechanism.</description><link>http://ayende.com/92161/reviewing-signalr-part-i#comment1</link><guid>http://ayende.com/92161/reviewing-signalr-part-i#comment1</guid><pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 18:49:33 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>