﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Ayende @ Rahien</title><link>http://ayende.com</link><description>Ayende @ Rahien</description><copyright>Copyright (C) Ayende Rahien  2004 - 2021 (c) 2026</copyright><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>Scooletz commented on Answer: Modifying execution approaches</title><description>I do like this old-style-Ayende post!</description><link>http://ayende.com/63490/answer-modifying-execution-approaches#comment6</link><guid>http://ayende.com/63490/answer-modifying-execution-approaches#comment6</guid><pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:10:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ayende Rahien commented on Answer: Modifying execution approaches</title><description>Bryan,
Agreed, and that was done already</description><link>http://ayende.com/63490/answer-modifying-execution-approaches#comment5</link><guid>http://ayende.com/63490/answer-modifying-execution-approaches#comment5</guid><pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 13:15:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ayende Rahien commented on Answer: Modifying execution approaches</title><description>Tobi, 
Yes, the affect is used only for starting the async op, not for the duration of it.</description><link>http://ayende.com/63490/answer-modifying-execution-approaches#comment4</link><guid>http://ayende.com/63490/answer-modifying-execution-approaches#comment4</guid><pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 13:14:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Leyu Sisay commented on Answer: Modifying execution approaches</title><description>+1 to @Bryan's comment</description><link>http://ayende.com/63490/answer-modifying-execution-approaches#comment3</link><guid>http://ayende.com/63490/answer-modifying-execution-approaches#comment3</guid><pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 13:00:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Bryan Murphy commented on Answer: Modifying execution approaches</title><description>You should abstract the timing mechanism into its own class that way you don't have to pepper your entire codebase with silverlight #includes.</description><link>http://ayende.com/63490/answer-modifying-execution-approaches#comment2</link><guid>http://ayende.com/63490/answer-modifying-execution-approaches#comment2</guid><pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 11:22:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>tobi commented on Answer: Modifying execution approaches</title><description>Hm, the using statement in line

using (multiLoadOperation.EnterMultiLoadContext())

will be exited immediately after setting up the async call. Is this intended?</description><link>http://ayende.com/63490/answer-modifying-execution-approaches#comment1</link><guid>http://ayende.com/63490/answer-modifying-execution-approaches#comment1</guid><pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 09:44:46 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>