﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Ayende @ Rahien</title><link>http://ayende.com</link><description>Ayende @ Rahien</description><copyright>Copyright (C) Ayende Rahien  2004 - 2021 (c) 2026</copyright><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>Scooletz commented on The right storage model</title><description>Isn't it all about paradigm of document data bases, not specifically Raven?
</description><link>http://ayende.com/4725/the-right-storage-model#comment5</link><guid>http://ayende.com/4725/the-right-storage-model#comment5</guid><pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:11:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Demis Bellot commented on The right storage model</title><description>I don't know why this is so special? You can Blob the order details on the Order row to achieve the same result. It's kept normalized on purpose for other benefits.
</description><link>http://ayende.com/4725/the-right-storage-model#comment4</link><guid>http://ayende.com/4725/the-right-storage-model#comment4</guid><pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:47:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ayende Rahien commented on The right storage model</title><description>Gavin,
  
You can do partial updates if you want to.
</description><link>http://ayende.com/4725/the-right-storage-model#comment3</link><guid>http://ayende.com/4725/the-right-storage-model#comment3</guid><pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:09:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Gavin commented on The right storage model</title><description>I can see how abstracting your transactional boundary around the design of your storage model would be a benefit but what about the exact opposite? If I don't want Orders to be locked when I am merely updating an order line(for performance etc) surely this does not mean that I have to separate my order lines from my order in terms of how it is represented in the document? For example, if you are only issuing a "known" partial update ... why lock something or make it part of the transaction if you aint gonna need it?
</description><link>http://ayende.com/4725/the-right-storage-model#comment2</link><guid>http://ayende.com/4725/the-right-storage-model#comment2</guid><pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:00:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>James L commented on The right storage model</title><description>Hmm, hadn't thought about it that way.  Interesting.
</description><link>http://ayende.com/4725/the-right-storage-model#comment1</link><guid>http://ayende.com/4725/the-right-storage-model#comment1</guid><pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:18:41 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>