﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Ayende @ Rahien</title><link>http://ayende.com</link><description>Ayende @ Rahien</description><copyright>Copyright (C) Ayende Rahien  2004 - 2021 (c) 2026</copyright><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>Ayende Rahien commented on RavenDB Multi Tenancy</title><description>Yes, it should
</description><link>http://ayende.com/4707/ravendb-multi-tenancy#comment12</link><guid>http://ayende.com/4707/ravendb-multi-tenancy#comment12</guid><pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 07:40:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Tony commented on RavenDB Multi Tenancy</title><description>@Ayende
  
Thanks for that, does this fix also cover DeleteByIndex too?
  
</description><link>http://ayende.com/4707/ravendb-multi-tenancy#comment11</link><guid>http://ayende.com/4707/ravendb-multi-tenancy#comment11</guid><pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 20:51:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ayende Rahien commented on RavenDB Multi Tenancy</title><description>Tony,
  
I _just_ fixed this bug, will be up in the new build
</description><link>http://ayende.com/4707/ravendb-multi-tenancy#comment10</link><guid>http://ayende.com/4707/ravendb-multi-tenancy#comment10</guid><pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:50:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Tony commented on RavenDB Multi Tenancy</title><description>Is it possible to create indexes in only one database?  At the moment i use the following code to create indexes:
  
  
IndexCreation.CreateIndexes(typeof(My_Index).Assembly, container.Resolve
&lt;idocumentstore());
  
  
is this method of creating indexes obsolete/bad practice?
&gt;</description><link>http://ayende.com/4707/ravendb-multi-tenancy#comment9</link><guid>http://ayende.com/4707/ravendb-multi-tenancy#comment9</guid><pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:48:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ayende Rahien commented on RavenDB Multi Tenancy</title><description>Chris,
  
I'll talk about this in my next post
</description><link>http://ayende.com/4707/ravendb-multi-tenancy#comment8</link><guid>http://ayende.com/4707/ravendb-multi-tenancy#comment8</guid><pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:21:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ayende Rahien commented on RavenDB Multi Tenancy</title><description>Scooletz,
  
Yes, that one would be very easy to do, then.
  
You can create a database in memory, which would fit what you want
</description><link>http://ayende.com/4707/ravendb-multi-tenancy#comment7</link><guid>http://ayende.com/4707/ravendb-multi-tenancy#comment7</guid><pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:21:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ayende Rahien commented on RavenDB Multi Tenancy</title><description>Shawn,
  
RavenDB works on Azure, yes.
</description><link>http://ayende.com/4707/ravendb-multi-tenancy#comment6</link><guid>http://ayende.com/4707/ravendb-multi-tenancy#comment6</guid><pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:20:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Chris Wright commented on RavenDB Multi Tenancy</title><description>How does this work with the REST API? Any idea how many people are using that rather than the C# client?
</description><link>http://ayende.com/4707/ravendb-multi-tenancy#comment5</link><guid>http://ayende.com/4707/ravendb-multi-tenancy#comment5</guid><pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:28:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Scooletz commented on RavenDB Multi Tenancy</title><description>@Ayende,
  
what I meant was using so-called temporary Raven db as a source for running Map/Reduces after filling it with data. With temporary, in-memory indexes feature in mind, it seems to allow you to easy work with that kind of task, doesn't? Am I missing sth?
</description><link>http://ayende.com/4707/ravendb-multi-tenancy#comment4</link><guid>http://ayende.com/4707/ravendb-multi-tenancy#comment4</guid><pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:04:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Shawn commented on RavenDB Multi Tenancy</title><description>I looked but couldn't find any mention elsewhere -- I realize that this competes to an extent with Table Storage, but do you have any plans for this to be hostable as an Azure Worker Role? You might be able to use a CloudDrive for your persistent storage, but I'm not sure about performance.
</description><link>http://ayende.com/4707/ravendb-multi-tenancy#comment3</link><guid>http://ayende.com/4707/ravendb-multi-tenancy#comment3</guid><pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:42:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ayende Rahien commented on RavenDB Multi Tenancy</title><description>Scooletz,
  
Can you give me a good idea about what you want exactly?
  
Please note that there is no facility to _delete_ a database. You can make it inaccessible, but not delete it.
</description><link>http://ayende.com/4707/ravendb-multi-tenancy#comment2</link><guid>http://ayende.com/4707/ravendb-multi-tenancy#comment2</guid><pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 12:30:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Scooletz commented on RavenDB Multi Tenancy</title><description>If creating dbs is so cheap, do you aim at creating task databases for some processes and delete them afterward?
</description><link>http://ayende.com/4707/ravendb-multi-tenancy#comment1</link><guid>http://ayende.com/4707/ravendb-multi-tenancy#comment1</guid><pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 12:28:27 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>