﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Ayende @ Rahien</title><link>http://ayende.com</link><description>Ayende @ Rahien</description><copyright>Copyright (C) Ayende Rahien  2004 - 2021 (c) 2026</copyright><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>Ayende Rahien commented on NHibernate – Mapping a single domain model to multiple physical data models</title><description>Peter, just try implementing that, it isn't hard
</description><link>http://ayende.com/4024/nhibernate-mapping-a-single-domain-model-to-multiple-physical-data-models#comment10</link><guid>http://ayende.com/4024/nhibernate-mapping-a-single-domain-model-to-multiple-physical-data-models#comment10</guid><pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 11:05:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Michel Grootjans commented on NHibernate – Mapping a single domain model to multiple physical data models</title><description>Thanks for the transcription of your session Oren. I couldn't quite figure out how to reproduce your work at SkillsMatter.
</description><link>http://ayende.com/4024/nhibernate-mapping-a-single-domain-model-to-multiple-physical-data-models#comment9</link><guid>http://ayende.com/4024/nhibernate-mapping-a-single-domain-model-to-multiple-physical-data-models#comment9</guid><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 20:47:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Omer Mor commented on NHibernate – Mapping a single domain model to multiple physical data models</title><description>Oh - sorry. I guess I was completely out of context here.
</description><link>http://ayende.com/4024/nhibernate-mapping-a-single-domain-model-to-multiple-physical-data-models#comment8</link><guid>http://ayende.com/4024/nhibernate-mapping-a-single-domain-model-to-multiple-physical-data-models#comment8</guid><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 21:36:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ayende Rahien commented on NHibernate – Mapping a single domain model to multiple physical data models</title><description>Omer,
  
I love the idea, but I am currently teaching, and I want to teach people from the basic up
</description><link>http://ayende.com/4024/nhibernate-mapping-a-single-domain-model-to-multiple-physical-data-models#comment7</link><guid>http://ayende.com/4024/nhibernate-mapping-a-single-domain-model-to-multiple-physical-data-models#comment7</guid><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 21:34:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Omer Mor commented on NHibernate – Mapping a single domain model to multiple physical data models</title><description>What about NH Lambda Extensions (
[http://code.google.com/p/nhlambdaextensions/](http://code.google.com/p/nhlambdaextensions/)) ?
  
And FluentNHibernate.Contrib (
[www.lostechies.com/.../...nh-contrib-is-alive.aspx](http://www.lostechies.com/blogs/derickbailey/archive/2009/05/13/fluentnhibernate-contrib-fnh-contrib-is-alive.aspx)) ?
  
  
I'm asking because I hate magic strings and I'm curios about the state of current string-less NH solutions, and your take on the subject. Do you think those projects have a future?
</description><link>http://ayende.com/4024/nhibernate-mapping-a-single-domain-model-to-multiple-physical-data-models#comment6</link><guid>http://ayende.com/4024/nhibernate-mapping-a-single-domain-model-to-multiple-physical-data-models#comment6</guid><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 21:29:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ayende Rahien commented on NHibernate – Mapping a single domain model to multiple physical data models</title><description>Omer,
  
Because L2NH isn't able to express all the richness that I have here.
</description><link>http://ayende.com/4024/nhibernate-mapping-a-single-domain-model-to-multiple-physical-data-models#comment5</link><guid>http://ayende.com/4024/nhibernate-mapping-a-single-domain-model-to-multiple-physical-data-models#comment5</guid><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 21:17:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Omer Mor commented on NHibernate – Mapping a single domain model to multiple physical data models</title><description>On a side note: 
  
You're known as a guy who hate magic strings (wasn't that what made you write RhinoMocks?).
  
So why don't you use Linq to NHibernate in your samples?
</description><link>http://ayende.com/4024/nhibernate-mapping-a-single-domain-model-to-multiple-physical-data-models#comment4</link><guid>http://ayende.com/4024/nhibernate-mapping-a-single-domain-model-to-multiple-physical-data-models#comment4</guid><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 19:54:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Jason commented on NHibernate – Mapping a single domain model to multiple physical data models</title><description>This is a great post about mapping options. Thank you for a post on (what i consider) advanced features of NH.
</description><link>http://ayende.com/4024/nhibernate-mapping-a-single-domain-model-to-multiple-physical-data-models#comment3</link><guid>http://ayende.com/4024/nhibernate-mapping-a-single-domain-model-to-multiple-physical-data-models#comment3</guid><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 13:28:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Colin Jack commented on NHibernate – Mapping a single domain model to multiple physical data models</title><description>&gt; (discriminator with joined classes, for example) 
  
  
Yeah in general the variety of mappings you've shown are a very poweful aspect of NHibernate, and I liked the discriminator with joined classes approach when we used it too. Good stuff.
</description><link>http://ayende.com/4024/nhibernate-mapping-a-single-domain-model-to-multiple-physical-data-models#comment2</link><guid>http://ayende.com/4024/nhibernate-mapping-a-single-domain-model-to-multiple-physical-data-models#comment2</guid><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 12:15:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Peter Morris commented on NHibernate – Mapping a single domain model to multiple physical data models</title><description>Discriminator with joined classes sounds like an interesting (hint) example ;-)
</description><link>http://ayende.com/4024/nhibernate-mapping-a-single-domain-model-to-multiple-physical-data-models#comment1</link><guid>http://ayende.com/4024/nhibernate-mapping-a-single-domain-model-to-multiple-physical-data-models#comment1</guid><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 10:00:36 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>