Ayende @ Rahienhttp://ayende.comAyende @ RahienCopyright (C) Ayende Rahien 2004 - 2021 (c) 202660Ayende Rahien commented on NH Prof documentation: Transaction and the second level cacheDoesn't matter. Trying to find edge cases would make the code more complex, commit the transaction, and good things will happen http://ayende.com/3799/nh-prof-documentation-transaction-and-the-second-level-cache#comment12http://ayende.com/3799/nh-prof-documentation-transaction-and-the-second-level-cache#comment12Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:54:08 GMTJafin commented on NH Prof documentation: Transaction and the second level cacheIf the entity has been marked mutable=false, would it make sense to automatically cache that? since it can't be changed? The Transaction doesn't make sense in that case. http://ayende.com/3799/nh-prof-documentation-transaction-and-the-second-level-cache#comment11http://ayende.com/3799/nh-prof-documentation-transaction-and-the-second-level-cache#comment11Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:46:53 GMTAyende Rahien commented on NH Prof documentation: Transaction and the second level cacheStuart, Not really. It can be anything. NH can't know about that, so it doesn't put things to the cache, so it will only put it in the cache after commit. http://ayende.com/3799/nh-prof-documentation-transaction-and-the-second-level-cache#comment10http://ayende.com/3799/nh-prof-documentation-transaction-and-the-second-level-cache#comment10Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:57:47 GMTStuart C commented on NH Prof documentation: Transaction and the second level cacheWhen you say, //Do something with post... I assume you mean changing the Post object you just received? If it was just a read I can't see why commiting the transaction makes any difference to the 2nd level cache? http://ayende.com/3799/nh-prof-documentation-transaction-and-the-second-level-cache#comment9http://ayende.com/3799/nh-prof-documentation-transaction-and-the-second-level-cache#comment9Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:47:54 GMTFabio Maulo commented on NH Prof documentation: Transaction and the second level cacheWell... all this stuff are enough to implement a TransactionProtection wrapper in our session-handling implementation ;) [code.google.com/.../...sactionProtectionWrapper.cs](http://code.google.com/p/unhaddins/source/browse/trunk/uNhAddIns/uNhAddIns/SessionEasier/BasicTransactionProtectionWrapper.cs) In uNhAddIns there is one implemented for Castle.DynamicProxy (obviously) http://ayende.com/3799/nh-prof-documentation-transaction-and-the-second-level-cache#comment8http://ayende.com/3799/nh-prof-documentation-transaction-and-the-second-level-cache#comment8Sat, 10 Jan 2009 21:05:12 GMTAyende Rahien commented on NH Prof documentation: Transaction and the second level cacheNHibernate is too low level to manage transactions internally http://ayende.com/3799/nh-prof-documentation-transaction-and-the-second-level-cache#comment7http://ayende.com/3799/nh-prof-documentation-transaction-and-the-second-level-cache#comment7Sat, 10 Jan 2009 14:24:34 GMTalberto commented on NH Prof documentation: Transaction and the second level cacheMaybe implicit is not the correct term, regarding your previous post. What I meant was that if you are always supposed to use those 2 usings together, wouldn't it be better to merge them in one, and enforce the use of transactions at the uow level? Is this still a bad idea? http://ayende.com/3799/nh-prof-documentation-transaction-and-the-second-level-cache#comment6http://ayende.com/3799/nh-prof-documentation-transaction-and-the-second-level-cache#comment6Sat, 10 Jan 2009 14:23:07 GMTAyende Rahien commented on NH Prof documentation: Transaction and the second level cacheAlberto, Because implicit transactions are a very bad idea. http://ayende.com/3799/nh-prof-documentation-transaction-and-the-second-level-cache#comment5http://ayende.com/3799/nh-prof-documentation-transaction-and-the-second-level-cache#comment5Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:13:45 GMTalberto commented on NH Prof documentation: Transaction and the second level cacheDammit, I had already read that. I think I have a memory leak. If you are always supposed to use transactions, then why doesn't NH do it implicitly for us? http://ayende.com/3799/nh-prof-documentation-transaction-and-the-second-level-cache#comment4http://ayende.com/3799/nh-prof-documentation-transaction-and-the-second-level-cache#comment4Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:07:36 GMTAyende Rahien commented on NH Prof documentation: Transaction and the second level cache[nhprof.com/.../Alert](http://nhprof.com/Learn/Alert?name=DoNotUseImplicitTransactions)http://ayende.com/3799/nh-prof-documentation-transaction-and-the-second-level-cache#comment3http://ayende.com/3799/nh-prof-documentation-transaction-and-the-second-level-cache#comment3Sat, 10 Jan 2009 11:56:00 GMTAyende Rahien commented on NH Prof documentation: Transaction and the second level cacheSee my previous discussion on that. http://ayende.com/3799/nh-prof-documentation-transaction-and-the-second-level-cache#comment2http://ayende.com/3799/nh-prof-documentation-transaction-and-the-second-level-cache#comment2Sat, 10 Jan 2009 11:55:15 GMTalberto commented on NH Prof documentation: Transaction and the second level cacheInteresting. Is this the solely reason to use transactions with selects or are there more reasons? http://ayende.com/3799/nh-prof-documentation-transaction-and-the-second-level-cache#comment1http://ayende.com/3799/nh-prof-documentation-transaction-and-the-second-level-cache#comment1Sat, 10 Jan 2009 11:50:43 GMT