Ayende @ Rahienhttp://ayende.comAyende @ RahienCopyright (C) Ayende Rahien 2004 - 2021 (c) 202660RafalG commented on Why Remoting is so painful?I think next version of C# will look like javascript and we'll use JSON for remoting. Microsoft must only realize that they need to get rid of compiler, static typing, generics, WCF/WF and all that disturbing sh*t and concentrate on making the framework easy to use. http://ayende.com/3727/why-remoting-is-so-painful#comment9http://ayende.com/3727/why-remoting-is-so-painful#comment9Thu, 27 Nov 2008 09:58:05 GMTNiki commented on Why Remoting is so painful?So... does that mean we can expect Rhino.Remoting soon? What interface would you use? Erlang-style message passing or RPC-style function calls. http://ayende.com/3727/why-remoting-is-so-painful#comment8http://ayende.com/3727/why-remoting-is-so-painful#comment8Thu, 27 Nov 2008 09:20:24 GMTSneal commented on Why Remoting is so painful?I would just use named pipes, assuming .NET 3.5 and the interaction was simple. Its worked well for me. [blogs.msdn.com/.../...pipes-justin-van-patten.aspx](http://blogs.msdn.com/bclteam/archive/2006/12/07/introducing-pipes-justin-van-patten.aspx)http://ayende.com/3727/why-remoting-is-so-painful#comment7http://ayende.com/3727/why-remoting-is-so-painful#comment7Wed, 26 Nov 2008 22:46:06 GMTRafalG commented on Why Remoting is so painful?The implementation of code-level security in .Net is like black magic to me, and my brain is totally resistant to it. I don't know anyone using it for any purpose, even no one who can tell where it could be sensibly used. The only option - give your code all possible permissions and pray it works. And .Net remoting - very nice at the beginning and ready to bite you when your application grows more complicated. Maybe WCF is better, but I'm afraid it's just a bit more painful than remoting http://ayende.com/3727/why-remoting-is-so-painful#comment6http://ayende.com/3727/why-remoting-is-so-painful#comment6Wed, 26 Nov 2008 18:59:22 GMTFrank Quednau commented on Why Remoting is so painful?Chris, you're right, I forgot. Sorry Ayende. Let's make this an...observation then: For every thing in our reality there is some other thing that will make the first thing break. http://ayende.com/3727/why-remoting-is-so-painful#comment5http://ayende.com/3727/why-remoting-is-so-painful#comment5Wed, 26 Nov 2008 18:51:17 GMTChris commented on Why Remoting is so painful?Frank: electrons have a catastrophic failure mode in the presence of positrons. http://ayende.com/3727/why-remoting-is-so-painful#comment4http://ayende.com/3727/why-remoting-is-so-painful#comment4Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:04:41 GMTThe Other Steve commented on Why Remoting is so painful?Doesn't WCF have better support for remoting? Especially locally? http://ayende.com/3727/why-remoting-is-so-painful#comment3http://ayende.com/3727/why-remoting-is-so-painful#comment3Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:56:26 GMTNeil Mosafi commented on Why Remoting is so painful?Urgh! Why not WCF with named pipes or something? http://ayende.com/3727/why-remoting-is-so-painful#comment2http://ayende.com/3727/why-remoting-is-so-painful#comment2Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:34:41 GMTFrank Quednau commented on Why Remoting is so painful?Woa, in which case you dislike every single piece of...anything? You'll have to stick to certain elementary particles. The electron is deemed quite stable and doesn't seem to have any motivation to just break. http://ayende.com/3727/why-remoting-is-so-painful#comment1http://ayende.com/3727/why-remoting-is-so-painful#comment1Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:13:29 GMT