﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Ayende @ Rahien</title><link>http://ayende.com</link><description>Ayende @ Rahien</description><copyright>Copyright (C) Ayende Rahien  2004 - 2021 (c) 2026</copyright><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>Dru commented on Building isolated components</title><description>I like the idea Oren.
  
-d
</description><link>http://ayende.com/3621/building-isolated-components#comment2</link><guid>http://ayende.com/3621/building-isolated-components#comment2</guid><pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 11:57:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Mark Nijhof commented on Building isolated components</title><description>Hi Ayende,
  
  
Interesting read about using isolation to be coherent to your SLA, I have also been thinking about isolation lately, not so much as to be able to provide these features. More about removing dependencies from all parts of the solution using both IoC and EDA to its fullest extent, I am baldly calling it NDA (No Dependency Architecture). I figure that this architecture provides the basis to enable what you suggest in your post. Even at a later date when you are violating the SLA and didn’t see it coming. Very interesting, thanks
  
  
[blog.fohjin.com/.../...dency-architecture-nda.html](http://blog.fohjin.com/2008/09/no-dependency-architecture-nda.html)  
  
-Mark
  
  
</description><link>http://ayende.com/3621/building-isolated-components#comment1</link><guid>http://ayende.com/3621/building-isolated-components#comment1</guid><pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 11:00:43 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>