﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Ayende @ Rahien</title><link>http://ayende.com</link><description>Ayende @ Rahien</description><copyright>Copyright (C) Ayende Rahien  2004 - 2021 (c) 2026</copyright><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>Neal Blomfield commented on I refuse to be an [type] developer</title><description>why not simply "I am a good developer" (I would actually argue for great in your case but then people might accuse you of being arrogant)
  
  
=)
</description><link>http://ayende.com/3600/i-refuse-to-be-an-type-developer#comment8</link><guid>http://ayende.com/3600/i-refuse-to-be-an-type-developer#comment8</guid><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:50:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Mike Brown commented on I refuse to be an [type] developer</title><description>I don't see myself as a developer at all. I see myself as a problem solver. The less code I have to write to get to a solution, the better in my eyes. The closer I can get a client to a solution with an off the shelf solution, the less code I have to code/maintain.
  
  
Of course there's a trade-off involved but you know what I mean.
  
  
That being said, I'd have to admit that my Java platform skills have diminished over the years I've been involved with .NET...I do have a strong natural aversion to learning/refreshing on a customer's dime (even to the extent of billing half when doing work that is exploratory). So even though I can claim more knowledge in Java development than most Java "consultants", my likelihood to accept a project drops significantly once Java enters the picture.
</description><link>http://ayende.com/3600/i-refuse-to-be-an-type-developer#comment7</link><guid>http://ayende.com/3600/i-refuse-to-be-an-type-developer#comment7</guid><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 21:26:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Doug commented on I refuse to be an [type] developer</title><description>couldn't you be a Type() developer? 
</description><link>http://ayende.com/3600/i-refuse-to-be-an-type-developer#comment6</link><guid>http://ayende.com/3600/i-refuse-to-be-an-type-developer#comment6</guid><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 08:58:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>josh commented on I refuse to be an [type] developer</title><description>I solve problems in with code.  That answer works for me.
</description><link>http://ayende.com/3600/i-refuse-to-be-an-type-developer#comment5</link><guid>http://ayende.com/3600/i-refuse-to-be-an-type-developer#comment5</guid><pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 03:55:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Daniel Lidstr&amp;#246;m commented on I refuse to be an [type] developer</title><description>At the same time, who wants to be an amateur at many things, but pro at nothing?
</description><link>http://ayende.com/3600/i-refuse-to-be-an-type-developer#comment4</link><guid>http://ayende.com/3600/i-refuse-to-be-an-type-developer#comment4</guid><pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 21:45:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Dave commented on I refuse to be an [type] developer</title><description>alt.net?
</description><link>http://ayende.com/3600/i-refuse-to-be-an-type-developer#comment3</link><guid>http://ayende.com/3600/i-refuse-to-be-an-type-developer#comment3</guid><pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 20:39:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Humberto commented on I refuse to be an [type] developer</title><description>As you said before, specialization if for insects.
</description><link>http://ayende.com/3600/i-refuse-to-be-an-type-developer#comment2</link><guid>http://ayende.com/3600/i-refuse-to-be-an-type-developer#comment2</guid><pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 19:29:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Frank Quednau commented on I refuse to be an [type] developer</title><description>boxing is lame ;)
</description><link>http://ayende.com/3600/i-refuse-to-be-an-type-developer#comment1</link><guid>http://ayende.com/3600/i-refuse-to-be-an-type-developer#comment1</guid><pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 19:24:23 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>