﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Ayende @ Rahien</title><link>http://ayende.com</link><description>Ayende @ Rahien</description><copyright>Copyright (C) Ayende Rahien  2004 - 2021 (c) 2026</copyright><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>Igor T. commented on Multi Tenancy</title><description>Any updates of your multi tenancy series? :)
</description><link>http://ayende.com/3494/multi-tenancy#comment7</link><guid>http://ayende.com/3494/multi-tenancy#comment7</guid><pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 00:25:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ayende Rahien commented on Multi Tenancy</title><description>Bob, 
  
I saw some of that previously, I am certainly going to go over that, but I think that I have a drastically different approach than LitwareHR
</description><link>http://ayende.com/3494/multi-tenancy#comment6</link><guid>http://ayende.com/3494/multi-tenancy#comment6</guid><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 23:03:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Bob Archer commented on Multi Tenancy</title><description>There is already quite a bit of information on this from MS, I think the PnP group. There are whitepapers on SaaS, different approaches and a reference app called LitwareHR. 
  
  
Check it out before you duplicate alot of work/information.
  
  
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/architecture/bb229292.aspx
  
  
BOb
  
</description><link>http://ayende.com/3494/multi-tenancy#comment5</link><guid>http://ayende.com/3494/multi-tenancy#comment5</guid><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 18:20:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Paul Cowan commented on Multi Tenancy</title><description>I like the name variability for customisations.
  
  
I work on a similar product with an instance for each customer.
  
  
Trying to express the variability is tough.  At the moment I am down the configuration route and it is taking me only so far.
  
  
What I want is to have a DSL for each section of variability.
  
  
For example we have different ETL processes for each client.  I am using Rhino.ETL to express this variability with a different .boo file for each client.
  
  
I am hoping to extend this to other sections.
  
</description><link>http://ayende.com/3494/multi-tenancy#comment4</link><guid>http://ayende.com/3494/multi-tenancy#comment4</guid><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 18:14:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Alex Simkin commented on Multi Tenancy</title><description>Oh, thank you for turning your attention to this!
</description><link>http://ayende.com/3494/multi-tenancy#comment3</link><guid>http://ayende.com/3494/multi-tenancy#comment3</guid><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 17:44:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ayende Rahien commented on Multi Tenancy</title><description>Yes, I'll deal with extended models
</description><link>http://ayende.com/3494/multi-tenancy#comment2</link><guid>http://ayende.com/3494/multi-tenancy#comment2</guid><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 14:45:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Thijs commented on Multi Tenancy</title><description>This is a very interesting topic, I'm also investigating this in how this would affect the Domain model and how to implement this in NHibernate.
  
  
I've come up with a &lt;dynamic-component&gt; kind of mapping to a IDictionary in my entity class.  Will you also adress this?  
  
  
kind regards, 
  
thijs
</description><link>http://ayende.com/3494/multi-tenancy#comment1</link><guid>http://ayende.com/3494/multi-tenancy#comment1</guid><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 14:37:39 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>