﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Ayende @ Rahien</title><link>http://ayende.com</link><description>Ayende @ Rahien</description><copyright>Copyright (C) Ayende Rahien  2004 - 2021 (c) 2026</copyright><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>Arne Claassen commented on Ugly Linq</title><description>"Sure they are both monadic syntax - which is awesome - but LINQ is just too limited and basised toward querying. "
  
  
Isn't it called (L)anguage (In)tegrated __(Q)uery__?
</description><link>http://ayende.com/3489/ugly-linq#comment3</link><guid>http://ayende.com/3489/ugly-linq#comment3</guid><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:09:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Andrew Davey commented on Ugly Linq</title><description>Re: "Not Interesting"
  
  
I agree with you.
  
I think F#'s computation expressions are more interesting, and certainly more flexible and powerful than LINQ. 
  
  
Sure they are both monadic syntax - which is awesome - but LINQ is just too limited and basised toward querying.
</description><link>http://ayende.com/3489/ugly-linq#comment2</link><guid>http://ayende.com/3489/ugly-linq#comment2</guid><pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 23:37:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Andrew Davey commented on Ugly Linq</title><description>Someone from the Nemerle community gave me some similar code for Nemerle:
  
http://files.rsdn.ru/73/NemerleLinqSupport.zip
  
  
Since Nemerle programs are built from expressions, not statements, it makes using the "expression tree" macro inline easier.
  
  
I've not used Boo for some time now. Has it got expression macros?
</description><link>http://ayende.com/3489/ugly-linq#comment1</link><guid>http://ayende.com/3489/ugly-linq#comment1</guid><pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 23:35:02 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>