﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Ayende @ Rahien</title><link>http://ayende.com</link><description>Ayende @ Rahien</description><copyright>Copyright (C) Ayende Rahien  2004 - 2021 (c) 2026</copyright><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>Ayende Rahien commented on Review: Mass Transit Samples</title><description>I would like to see the code, the most aspects on this that I can see, the better.
</description><link>http://ayende.com/3350/review-mass-transit-samples#comment3</link><guid>http://ayende.com/3350/review-mass-transit-samples#comment3</guid><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 22:39:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>shawn commented on Review: Mass Transit Samples</title><description>whoops, left out a key part: that in-house framework makes use of castle pretty heavily - it uses windsor for ioc, and we've built a couple of custom facilities for things like MSMQ queue management and as a configuration pseudo-DSL. however, in terms of feature breadth, it's v .5 to NSB's v5.
</description><link>http://ayende.com/3350/review-mass-transit-samples#comment2</link><guid>http://ayende.com/3350/review-mass-transit-samples#comment2</guid><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 22:38:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>shawn commented on Review: Mass Transit Samples</title><description>You know, I have an in-house framework that turns out to be very similar to NSB (it either hadn't been released yet or I just didn't know of it, otherwise I probably wouldn't have rolled my own) that I've been thinking of open sourcing. If you ever seriously consider going your own way, send me an email, and if I can't contribute that code directly, I'd at least love to be involved.
</description><link>http://ayende.com/3350/review-mass-transit-samples#comment1</link><guid>http://ayende.com/3350/review-mass-transit-samples#comment1</guid><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 22:35:49 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>