Ayende @ Rahien

Ivaylo Bratoev commented on Rhino Mocks 3.5 Beta Released

Wed, 04 Jun 2008 19:18:50 GMT

Actually, I wrote that I cannot set up values on read only properties of a stub. I used this code: var person = MockRepository.GenerateStub(); person.Stub(x => x.IsGeek).Return(true); What confused me was that person.IsGeek property returns true only the first time. I have to add ...Repeat.Any() to make it work properly. I think that for STUBS the default behavior should be ...Repeat.Any() not Repeat.Once(). What do you think of that? I posted both issues on the mailing list.

Ayende Rahien commented on Rhino Mocks 3.5 Beta Released

Wed, 04 Jun 2008 16:14:54 GMT

You can setup return values for stubs, yes. Same way you use it elsewhere. Rhino Mocks mailing list on google groups

Ivaylo Bratoev commented on Rhino Mocks 3.5 Beta Released

Wed, 04 Jun 2008 14:57:08 GMT

Thanks for the fast response. Do I guess properly that I cannot set up return values on readonly properties of a stub? And, Ayende, what list do you refer to?

Ayende Rahien commented on Rhino Mocks 3.5 Beta Released

Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:45:27 GMT

Ivaylo, Right now, I don't think you can. Please post this to the list.

Ivaylo Bratoev commented on Rhino Mocks 3.5 Beta Released

Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:42:07 GMT

This syntaxis is really cool. The AAA model seems more natural than the record-replay. I have one issue with it - how assert that a method on a stub with 0 parameters was called only once?