﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Ayende @ Rahien</title><link>http://ayende.com</link><description>Ayende @ Rahien</description><copyright>Copyright (C) Ayende Rahien  2004 - 2021 (c) 2026</copyright><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>Joseph Gutierrez commented on Funding Open Source Projects</title><description>Try this:
  
  
http://www.paulgraham.com/good.html
</description><link>http://ayende.com/3282/funding-open-source-projects#comment8</link><guid>http://ayende.com/3282/funding-open-source-projects#comment8</guid><pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:09:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Drew Miller commented on Funding Open Source Projects</title><description>You're right, and I know better. My apologies.
</description><link>http://ayende.com/3282/funding-open-source-projects#comment7</link><guid>http://ayende.com/3282/funding-open-source-projects#comment7</guid><pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:46:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Andres G. Aragoneses commented on Funding Open Source Projects</title><description>&gt;As I mentioned during the talk at the conference, I think we
  
&gt;need to focus less on directly funding open source projects &gt;(and dedicated OSS developers) and more on convincing
  
&gt;large-scale companies to choose OSS over commercial
  
&gt;(particularly Microsoft) software.
  
  
Please stop doing this. The opposite term of OSS is not commercial software. Open source software *is* commercial software. The opposite term is *proprietary*.
</description><link>http://ayende.com/3282/funding-open-source-projects#comment6</link><guid>http://ayende.com/3282/funding-open-source-projects#comment6</guid><pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:30:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Drew Miller commented on Funding Open Source Projects</title><description>As I mentioned during the talk at the conference, I think we need to focus less on directly funding open source projects (and dedicated OSS developers) and more on convincing large-scale companies to choose OSS over commercial (particularly Microsoft) software. 
  
  
If more .NET developers use OSS day-to-day (because it is the best tool for the job at hand), OSS will improve, rapidly, without any direct funding. I know this means developers don't get to spend all day for weeks or months on end working on OSS. But I don't think that's always helpful in the first place. It is dangerous to develop any sort of software that you don't actually use in a real-world way.
  
  
You might be concerned that this will cover the smaller changes and fixes for an OSS project, but not the big (v.Next-type) changes. I think if more and larger companies were using .NET OSS the opportunities would present themselves. Time would prove me right or wrong.
</description><link>http://ayende.com/3282/funding-open-source-projects#comment5</link><guid>http://ayende.com/3282/funding-open-source-projects#comment5</guid><pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 07:32:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Sergio Pereira commented on Funding Open Source Projects</title><description>As a variation of Grants, Bounties can be interesting and have the nice side effect of adding new contributors to the project. Instead of asking Oren to add feature X to to the project, a monetary prize could be offered to whoever contribute that feature (first?). 
</description><link>http://ayende.com/3282/funding-open-source-projects#comment4</link><guid>http://ayende.com/3282/funding-open-source-projects#comment4</guid><pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 02:56:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ohad Aston commented on Funding Open Source Projects</title><description>Open source doesn't need to bee free. ExtJs is a good example (although extjs is company).
  
  
The main problem with OSS is the documentation and tutorieals. And I'm willing to pay for it. (and did it before).
</description><link>http://ayende.com/3282/funding-open-source-projects#comment3</link><guid>http://ayende.com/3282/funding-open-source-projects#comment3</guid><pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 19:19:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Torkel commented on Funding Open Source Projects</title><description>Yes, NHQ is great, it should be merged into nhibernate :)
  
  
I think some some cases NHQ beats the LINQ syntax (for example when querying across relations).
  
  
I think the issue of oss funding and almost more importantly commercial support services for oss projects is a critical issue that the .NET community and Microsoft need to solve if the .NET platform is going to stay competitive compared to java. 
  
  
I think a trend in enterprise companies is a move away from single supplier dependence (i.e. Microsoft), and what that really means is a move toward java and open source.   
</description><link>http://ayende.com/3282/funding-open-source-projects#comment2</link><guid>http://ayende.com/3282/funding-open-source-projects#comment2</guid><pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:38:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Steve commented on Funding Open Source Projects</title><description>One thought: Seems sponsership would be a good route, selling that the product gives them advertisement &amp; good reputation leading to paid work/support ?
  
  
imo, this means stable &amp; documentation.  
  
  
btw I would pay for your NQG :)   (if I could figure out how to use it  - :)
  
  
I'm using ms mvc w/spring.net &amp; nhibernate - I like the linq syntax, but I'm on NH 1.2
  
  
(sorry for shorthand type - I'm holding my 2 yr old &amp; typing w/1 hand)
</description><link>http://ayende.com/3282/funding-open-source-projects#comment1</link><guid>http://ayende.com/3282/funding-open-source-projects#comment1</guid><pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 11:26:03 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>