﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Ayende @ Rahien</title><link>http://ayende.com</link><description>Ayende @ Rahien</description><copyright>Copyright (C) Ayende Rahien  2004 - 2021 (c) 2026</copyright><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>Ayende Rahien commented on Attack of the virtual machines</title><description>Tolga,
  
I did development on a 512MB VM in a 1GB second hand laptop. It works, not fun, but it works.
  
I tend to do most of my dev on the host machine, with the VM serving as servers, integration and CI
</description><link>http://ayende.com/3236/attack-of-the-virtual-machines#comment2</link><guid>http://ayende.com/3236/attack-of-the-virtual-machines#comment2</guid><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 16:02:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Tolga commented on Attack of the virtual machines</title><description>I love the concept of working in VMs, whereby not having to "muck" with your core "host" OS.
  
  
However, I always end up finding the performance too slow (I have used VMWare Workstation so far).  I usually have 4GB of RAM in a high end laptop and dedicate about 2GB to the guest OS.  Forget about having more than one VM running at a time - impossible performance...
  
  
I am genuinely interested in finding out whether you can actually effectively work in VMs to do serious development.  If so, I wonder what I could be doing differently or better to get acceptable performance...  Are there any "gotcha" pointers?
  
  
Thanks
</description><link>http://ayende.com/3236/attack-of-the-virtual-machines#comment1</link><guid>http://ayende.com/3236/attack-of-the-virtual-machines#comment1</guid><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:48:38 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>