﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Ayende @ Rahien</title><link>http://ayende.com</link><description>Ayende @ Rahien</description><copyright>Copyright (C) Ayende Rahien  2004 - 2021 (c) 2026</copyright><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>Tobin Harris commented on Rhino ETL: Targets</title><description>Oops, overlooked your "sequence" syntax, that is *very* nice :-)
</description><link>http://ayende.com/2680/rhino-etl-targets#comment2</link><guid>http://ayende.com/2680/rhino-etl-targets#comment2</guid><pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 07:09:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Tobin Harris commented on Rhino ETL: Targets</title><description>That looks great. I assume you can also just do 
  
  
target withDependencies:
  
  Execute("AfterCopyOrders").After(Execute("CopyOrders"))
  
  
?
  
  
What about this also as an idea...
  
  
Execute("CopyOrders").Then(Execute("AfterCopyOrders"))
  
  
or even
  
  
Execute("CopyOrders").Then("AfterCopyOrders")
  
  
</description><link>http://ayende.com/2680/rhino-etl-targets#comment1</link><guid>http://ayende.com/2680/rhino-etl-targets#comment1</guid><pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 07:07:24 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>