Ayende @ Rahien

Ayende Rahien commented on Rhino Mocks Events: Purity vs. Practicality

Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:01:18 GMT

What version did you get? 3.1? It should definitely be there

irfan commented on Rhino Mocks Events: Purity vs. Practicality

Wed, 13 Jun 2007 01:57:53 GMT

i downloaded the latest version of Rhino mock. but could find the the interface IEventRaiser. what could be the probelm. i shifted from NMock because there is no event support for nmock.

Ayende Rahien commented on Rhino Mocks Events: Purity vs. Practicality

Sat, 09 Jun 2007 03:36:06 GMT

Aaron, Nice syntax, but it is very un-natural thing to do. Still, something to remember for sure.

Aaron Jensen commented on Rhino Mocks Events: Purity vs. Practicality

Fri, 08 Jun 2007 21:15:20 GMT

I sent you an email about this about something like this a year ago... I don't remember if you responded, but basically I suggested syntax like this: obj.Bar += mocks.Raise(EventArgs.Empty); and behind the scenes it would look kind of like this: // Obj class: private object[] _args = null; private bool _raise; delegate void Foo(string hi); private event Foo BarBack; private event Foo Bar { add { // if playing back: if (_raise) { BarBack.DynamicInvoke(_args); _raise = false; } } remove { } } // MockRepository: private T Raise(params object[] args) where T : class { _args = args; _raise = true; return null; } So basically you'd set the flag and then ignore the next call to an event but actually raise the event instead. Kind of hacky, but it gets rid of strings.