﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Ayende @ Rahien</title><link>http://ayende.com</link><description>Ayende @ Rahien</description><copyright>Copyright (C) Ayende Rahien  2004 - 2021 (c) 2026</copyright><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>Ayende Rahien commented on Integrated Tools vs. Collaborating Tools</title><description>Trac, right now.
</description><link>http://ayende.com/2353/integrated-tools-vs-collaborating-tools#comment5</link><guid>http://ayende.com/2353/integrated-tools-vs-collaborating-tools#comment5</guid><pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 03:54:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Michael commented on Integrated Tools vs. Collaborating Tools</title><description>So what do you like to use for defect tracking? 
</description><link>http://ayende.com/2353/integrated-tools-vs-collaborating-tools#comment4</link><guid>http://ayende.com/2353/integrated-tools-vs-collaborating-tools#comment4</guid><pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 21:56:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Rik Hemsley commented on Integrated Tools vs. Collaborating Tools</title><description>VI versus EMACS arguments are pointless and a waste of time.
  
  
VI is the best.
  
</description><link>http://ayende.com/2353/integrated-tools-vs-collaborating-tools#comment3</link><guid>http://ayende.com/2353/integrated-tools-vs-collaborating-tools#comment3</guid><pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 07:26:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ayende Rahien commented on Integrated Tools vs. Collaborating Tools</title><description>&gt; not spend a lot of money on system maintainance and configuration (OSS) and get our products shipped.
  
  
I do too, that is why I am using the toolset that I do, because I don't want to deal with babysitting TFS.
  
I config it once, and then forget it, literally.
  
  
&gt; I stand on the point that TFS and VSTS is a great bargain and is not free like a puppy.
  
  
That is a non issue to me, since I am not the one paying for the thing :-) I am more concern on its usage.
  
</description><link>http://ayende.com/2353/integrated-tools-vs-collaborating-tools#comment2</link><guid>http://ayende.com/2353/integrated-tools-vs-collaborating-tools#comment2</guid><pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 03:52:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>David Starr commented on Integrated Tools vs. Collaborating Tools</title><description>LOL.  You got me on a few there :).
  
  
I feel my team has leaked money debating these issues of tools and process.  I have seen so much time spent on the debate of red widgets vs. blue widgets that I think we can forget the real reason why we are all here:  Shipping high quality product with spectacular new features.
  
  
Frankly, I stand on the point that TFS and VSTS is a great bargain and is not free like a puppy.  Further, I admit that Team System is v1.0 software.  I gotta tell you, MS really hit a triple on this product.  Maybe not a home run, but that can come on rev 2.  They definately hit a triple thoug.
  
  
With that in mind, I am anxious to simply use the tools to their fullest capacity, not spend a lot of money on system maintainance and configuration (OSS) and get our products shipped.
  
  
Emacs rules, BTW.
  
  
</description><link>http://ayende.com/2353/integrated-tools-vs-collaborating-tools#comment1</link><guid>http://ayende.com/2353/integrated-tools-vs-collaborating-tools#comment1</guid><pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 02:33:21 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>