﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Ayende @ Rahien</title><link>http://ayende.com</link><description>Ayende @ Rahien</description><copyright>Copyright (C) Ayende Rahien  2004 - 2021 (c) 2026</copyright><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>Tomer Gabel commented on Adding additional information to XML files conforming to a schema</title><description>You might be able to include an inline schema and derive from the base type (the one defining "class"). This is not necessarily easy to do, and certainly not a lot of fun, but may work.
  
</description><link>http://ayende.com/2229/adding-additional-information-to-xml-files-conforming-to-a-schema#comment2</link><guid>http://ayende.com/2229/adding-additional-information-to-xml-files-conforming-to-a-schema#comment2</guid><pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 12:55:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>James Kovacs commented on Adding additional information to XML files conforming to a schema</title><description>It doesn't look like the NHibernate schema can be easily extended without modification of the original schema. If a schema is designed to be extended, it includes &lt;xs:any namespace="##any"/&gt;  and &lt;xs:anyAttribute namespace="##any"/&gt; in the complexType definition. As far as I know, this is the only mechanism that will not causing XML Schema validators to fail if your modifications are present, but the validator doesn't have a definition for your additions.
</description><link>http://ayende.com/2229/adding-additional-information-to-xml-files-conforming-to-a-schema#comment1</link><guid>http://ayende.com/2229/adding-additional-information-to-xml-files-conforming-to-a-schema#comment1</guid><pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 03:18:47 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>