﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Ayende @ Rahien</title><link>http://ayende.com</link><description>Ayende @ Rahien</description><copyright>Copyright (C) Ayende Rahien  2004 - 2021 (c) 2026</copyright><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>shawn hinsey commented on Finding the performance problem</title><description>Sounds like a great use case for that expiring hack exception you wrote about!
</description><link>http://ayende.com/2177/finding-the-performance-problem#comment3</link><guid>http://ayende.com/2177/finding-the-performance-problem#comment3</guid><pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 09:00:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ayende Rahien commented on Finding the performance problem</title><description>The reasoning behind it is sound (I think), I want to simulate a real latency for now, since I would be replacing this with a web service call, and I don't want all the tests that makes assumptions about the length of the call to break when I do.
  
I should also mention that it is in a class called: FakeInserter
</description><link>http://ayende.com/2177/finding-the-performance-problem#comment2</link><guid>http://ayende.com/2177/finding-the-performance-problem#comment2</guid><pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:05:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Rik Hemsley commented on Finding the performance problem</title><description>You just lost my respect for writing that Thread.Sleep(1000) then regained it when I remembered you'd just admitted it to the world.
</description><link>http://ayende.com/2177/finding-the-performance-problem#comment1</link><guid>http://ayende.com/2177/finding-the-performance-problem#comment1</guid><pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 21:56:07 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>