﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Ayende @ Rahien</title><link>http://ayende.com</link><description>Ayende @ Rahien</description><copyright>Copyright (C) Ayende Rahien  2004 - 2021 (c) 2026</copyright><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>Harald commented on Enterprise Library License</title><description>But doesn't "... that run on ..." translate to "... that at least run on ..."? I cannot see an explicit prohibition that derivate works are not allowed to run somewhere else, but I'm not a lawyer though.
</description><link>http://ayende.com/2150/enterprise-library-license#comment7</link><guid>http://ayende.com/2150/enterprise-library-license#comment7</guid><pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 14:06:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ayende Rahien commented on Enterprise Library License</title><description>@Adi,
  
Mono is an implementation of the .Net framework that runs on *nix.
</description><link>http://ayende.com/2150/enterprise-library-license#comment6</link><guid>http://ayende.com/2150/enterprise-library-license#comment6</guid><pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:51:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ayende Rahien commented on Enterprise Library License</title><description>@Andres,
  
I haven't looked at the code.
  
I _have_ written my own proxy impl, or at least modified what hammett has written.
  
I can't think of many people who would try to make this kind of attempt
</description><link>http://ayende.com/2150/enterprise-library-license#comment5</link><guid>http://ayende.com/2150/enterprise-library-license#comment5</guid><pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:47:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Adi commented on Enterprise Library License</title><description>Since the EntLib is for the .Net framework, which in turn depends on Windows OS, why does that bother you?
  
Do you see a scenario in which you'll develope something with EntLib NOT for MS Windows?
</description><link>http://ayende.com/2150/enterprise-library-license#comment4</link><guid>http://ayende.com/2150/enterprise-library-license#comment4</guid><pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:43:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Anders Nor&amp;#229;s commented on Enterprise Library License</title><description>Is the code available for download? After reading the "behind the scenes" post at edjez's blog I was suprised that they chose remoting proxies since this is very inefficient. It is said that you can write your own proxying impl., but I don't think many people will bother to do this. 
</description><link>http://ayende.com/2150/enterprise-library-license#comment3</link><guid>http://ayende.com/2150/enterprise-library-license#comment3</guid><pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:04:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ayende Rahien commented on Enterprise Library License</title><description>I looked at the policy injection block, it has a very invasive approach, requiring that you would use a special factory, etc. There is also an additional 20ms overhead of this in most scenarios. They don't even touch the debugging issues that this can cause, etc. I would have liked to see them using the dynamic override approach. And I have yet to see what kind of integration this has with object builder.
  
Overall, I was doing this kind of stuff two years ago... so I am not really impressed.
</description><link>http://ayende.com/2150/enterprise-library-license#comment2</link><guid>http://ayende.com/2150/enterprise-library-license#comment2</guid><pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 10:55:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Anders Nor&amp;#229;s commented on Enterprise Library License</title><description>Agreed. I installed the CTP for EntLib 3.0 yesterday to take a look at the "Policy Injection" block (which wasn't there) and I got a creepy feeling when I read this. 
</description><link>http://ayende.com/2150/enterprise-library-license#comment1</link><guid>http://ayende.com/2150/enterprise-library-license#comment1</guid><pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 10:50:41 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>