﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Ayende @ Rahien</title><link>http://ayende.com</link><description>Ayende @ Rahien</description><copyright>Copyright (C) Ayende Rahien  2004 - 2021 (c) 2026</copyright><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>Ayende Rahien commented on More on Emitting Multi Dimentional Arrays</title><description>While this is helpful, I have an existing code base that uses Reflection Emit, and it is not practical to move it to Cecil.
  
</description><link>http://ayende.com/2117/more-on-emitting-multi-dimentional-arrays#comment3</link><guid>http://ayende.com/2117/more-on-emitting-multi-dimentional-arrays#comment3</guid><pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 23:12:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Jb Evain commented on More on Emitting Multi Dimentional Arrays</title><description>That works perfectly tho:
  
  
http://monoport.com/1811
  
  
</description><link>http://ayende.com/2117/more-on-emitting-multi-dimentional-arrays#comment2</link><guid>http://ayende.com/2117/more-on-emitting-multi-dimentional-arrays#comment2</guid><pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 20:37:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Tomer Gabel commented on More on Emitting Multi Dimentional Arrays</title><description>I think Microsoft actually fucked up on this. I played around with it and there doesn't seem to be any way to define a method other than TypeBuilder.DefineMethod, which requires you to define everything manually.
  
  
I think a much more reasonable solution would be an overload of DefineMethod which accepts a MethodInfo instance as prototype. It would potentially save heaps of bug, even if we ignore this particular (esoteric) bug in the class library.
  
  
Anyway I suggest you open a bug report on this.
  
</description><link>http://ayende.com/2117/more-on-emitting-multi-dimentional-arrays#comment1</link><guid>http://ayende.com/2117/more-on-emitting-multi-dimentional-arrays#comment1</guid><pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 18:07:23 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>