﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Ayende @ Rahien</title><link>http://ayende.com</link><description>Ayende @ Rahien</description><copyright>Copyright (C) Ayende Rahien  2004 - 2021 (c) 2026</copyright><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>Ayende Rahien commented on RavenDB vNext? Just the same, a little bit better, all over the place</title><description>Rafal,
If you want the perf monitor values, you can get them using the standard methods. Windows provide many such options. And any monitoring tool can handle that.</description><link>http://ayende.com/161378/ravendb-vnext-just-the-same-a-little-bit-better-all-over-the-place#comment6</link><guid>http://ayende.com/161378/ravendb-vnext-just-the-same-a-little-bit-better-all-over-the-place#comment6</guid><pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 09:08:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Rafal commented on RavenDB vNext? Just the same, a little bit better, all over the place</title><description>I think it's very useful to have performance stats, but it would be even nicer if Raven exposed current performance numbers so they could be queried and stored by external monitoring tools (Cacti, for example)
I  thought about using NLog for sending out performance information over UDP, this way you could use NLog's configuration to decide which stats should be provided to your reporting tool.
</description><link>http://ayende.com/161378/ravendb-vnext-just-the-same-a-little-bit-better-all-over-the-place#comment5</link><guid>http://ayende.com/161378/ravendb-vnext-just-the-same-a-little-bit-better-all-over-the-place#comment5</guid><pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 08:57:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ayende Rahien commented on RavenDB vNext? Just the same, a little bit better, all over the place</title><description>Vlad,
2.5 is 2.1 renamed, and moving from 2.0 to 2.5 is pretty seamless, yes. Note, however, that 2.5 is considered unstable.</description><link>http://ayende.com/161378/ravendb-vnext-just-the-same-a-little-bit-better-all-over-the-place#comment4</link><guid>http://ayende.com/161378/ravendb-vnext-just-the-same-a-little-bit-better-all-over-the-place#comment4</guid><pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 05:57:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Rob Ashton commented on RavenDB vNext? Just the same, a little bit better, all over the place</title><description>All the topics have their own RSS feed - you could very easily create a Yahoo pipe that says "the whole feed unless it contains the Raven tag" :-)

If Yahoo pipes still exists that is.</description><link>http://ayende.com/161378/ravendb-vnext-just-the-same-a-little-bit-better-all-over-the-place#comment3</link><guid>http://ayende.com/161378/ravendb-vnext-just-the-same-a-little-bit-better-all-over-the-place#comment3</guid><pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 17:43:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Adam commented on RavenDB vNext? Just the same, a little bit better, all over the place</title><description>Hi Oren,

I love your posts, but as I'm not a RavenDB user I would realy love to get the design/testing/architecture posts (not RavenDB relative) on a different rss feed :)

Thanks.</description><link>http://ayende.com/161378/ravendb-vnext-just-the-same-a-little-bit-better-all-over-the-place#comment2</link><guid>http://ayende.com/161378/ravendb-vnext-just-the-same-a-little-bit-better-all-over-the-place#comment2</guid><pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:02:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Vlad commented on RavenDB vNext? Just the same, a little bit better, all over the place</title><description>Pretty!
It's great to have that kind of feedback on internal stuff.

So far, is moving 2.1 to 2.5 supposed to be seamless? Love all the 2.5 features but want to wait a bit until we use it as our main version.
</description><link>http://ayende.com/161378/ravendb-vnext-just-the-same-a-little-bit-better-all-over-the-place#comment1</link><guid>http://ayende.com/161378/ravendb-vnext-just-the-same-a-little-bit-better-all-over-the-place#comment1</guid><pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 12:37:16 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>