﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Ayende @ Rahien</title><link>http://ayende.com</link><description>Ayende @ Rahien</description><copyright>Copyright (C) Ayende Rahien  2004 - 2021 (c) 2026</copyright><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>Asaf commented on FLOSS Moling with RavenDB</title><description>it would probably run faster if all the queries were under the same transaction:
using (var scope = db.GetTransaction())</description><link>http://ayende.com/160834/floss-moling-with-ravendb#comment4</link><guid>http://ayende.com/160834/floss-moling-with-ravendb#comment4</guid><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 11:52:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ayende Rahien commented on FLOSS Moling with RavenDB</title><description>Flukus,
Yes, it does. Although the capping wasn't physical, it was just that the biggest collection they had was 20 items in size.</description><link>http://ayende.com/160834/floss-moling-with-ravendb#comment3</link><guid>http://ayende.com/160834/floss-moling-with-ravendb#comment3</guid><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 06:05:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>flukus commented on FLOSS Moling with RavenDB</title><description>You mentioned the many to one relationships were capped at 20. Out of curiosity, does raven support fixed length arrays on models?</description><link>http://ayende.com/160834/floss-moling-with-ravendb#comment2</link><guid>http://ayende.com/160834/floss-moling-with-ravendb#comment2</guid><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 20:51:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>peter commented on FLOSS Moling with RavenDB</title><description>Agreed, the workbench app is bad. I only use the "legacy" admin and query apps.</description><link>http://ayende.com/160834/floss-moling-with-ravendb#comment1</link><guid>http://ayende.com/160834/floss-moling-with-ravendb#comment1</guid><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 18:49:18 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>