﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Ayende @ Rahien</title><link>http://ayende.com</link><description>Ayende @ Rahien</description><copyright>Copyright (C) Ayende Rahien  2004 - 2021 (c) 2026</copyright><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>Ayende Rahien commented on What is up with RavenDB 2.0?</title><description>Georgios,
We run into memory issues, looking into that now.</description><link>http://ayende.com/160129/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0#comment17</link><guid>http://ayende.com/160129/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0#comment17</guid><pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 14:13:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Georgios commented on What is up with RavenDB 2.0?</title><description>Any closer to a release date?</description><link>http://ayende.com/160129/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0#comment16</link><guid>http://ayende.com/160129/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0#comment16</guid><pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 14:12:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ayende Rahien commented on What is up with RavenDB 2.0?</title><description>Sam,
It is going to be out this month,</description><link>http://ayende.com/160129/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0#comment15</link><guid>http://ayende.com/160129/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0#comment15</guid><pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 08:13:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Sam commented on What is up with RavenDB 2.0?</title><description>+1 to the HTML5 studio. I would trade every feature in this post for not having to deal with Silverlight any more.

The other thing causing us a lot of pain is the Newtonsoft.Json version conflict with MVC4. Is there a 2.0 release date yet?</description><link>http://ayende.com/160129/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0#comment14</link><guid>http://ayende.com/160129/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0#comment14</guid><pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 08:12:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Bjorn Coltof commented on What is up with RavenDB 2.0?</title><description>Spare me the comparison, such articles only draw out the zealots. Just do the comparison yourself, should not be so hard...</description><link>http://ayende.com/160129/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0#comment13</link><guid>http://ayende.com/160129/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0#comment13</guid><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 09:32:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Voyagers Club commented on What is up with RavenDB 2.0?</title><description>When an article Mongo DB vs Raven DB ? </description><link>http://ayende.com/160129/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0#comment12</link><guid>http://ayende.com/160129/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0#comment12</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2012 20:56:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ayende Rahien commented on What is up with RavenDB 2.0?</title><description>William,
Yes, you can do that like that. And it is triggered on changes to a document with the prefix "users/"</description><link>http://ayende.com/160129/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0#comment11</link><guid>http://ayende.com/160129/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0#comment11</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2012 12:02:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Kaveh Shahbazian commented on What is up with RavenDB 2.0?</title><description>I fell in love with RavenDB and I played with it a lot just for fun; but unfortunately I can not use it in my productions. The licensing prevents me even from using it as a backend for a service. And price is too high for my company. But besides that RavenDB is a really nice product.</description><link>http://ayende.com/160129/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0#comment10</link><guid>http://ayende.com/160129/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0#comment10</guid><pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2012 14:21:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>William H commented on What is up with RavenDB 2.0?</title><description>For the changes API when you say "a set of documents" do you mean a collection like "users".

If so does it get triggered when the collection changes (i.e. add / update of a document in the collection)?</description><link>http://ayende.com/160129/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0#comment9</link><guid>http://ayende.com/160129/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0#comment9</guid><pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 20:12:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>John Farrell commented on What is up with RavenDB 2.0?</title><description>I have two Mongo systems in production and have been experimenting with RavenDb and would never use Mongo again.  The productivity from even the 1.0 management studio and ease of use inside .NET make it a very easy choice.

RavenDb is so freaking fast and productive to develop with I really wouldn't care if Mongo was twice as fast.

The benefits I gain in productivity save me so much time I'd worry about scaling when it happens.  Besides, unless you are a top 10,000 website or have billions of documents chances are Raven will perform just fine and all the facets,map/reduce and indexing features of Ravendb handle a lot of the issues you'll encounter anyway.

For example a mongo application I was part of had this weird taxonomy of attributes  that eventually required a full custom lucene implementation and all sorts of extra work just to make searching the data perform well.  

I recreated the multi week project in RavenDb index in an afternoon.  :p



</description><link>http://ayende.com/160129/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0#comment8</link><guid>http://ayende.com/160129/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0#comment8</guid><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 21:02:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Judah Gabriel Himango commented on What is up with RavenDB 2.0?</title><description>Woops, wrong quote. :-) I meant to quote the post,

"We spent a lot of time there, and you can now do pretty much everything you want in RavenDB through the studio. This seems like a stupid major feature, right? After all, this is just the UI that was updated, and RavenDB is actually the server stuff."</description><link>http://ayende.com/160129/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0#comment7</link><guid>http://ayende.com/160129/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0#comment7</guid><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 20:55:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Judah Gabriel Himango commented on What is up with RavenDB 2.0?</title><description>&gt;&gt; "You said people wouldn't keep the radio station going. It'd be just a toy, and wouldn't work financially. That's is failure."

Not at all. Tooling is often overlooked in the NoSQL space. I find Mongo's management studio severely lacking. Glad to see Raven 2.0 improving its tooling.</description><link>http://ayende.com/160129/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0#comment6</link><guid>http://ayende.com/160129/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0#comment6</guid><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 20:54:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Khalid Abuhakmeh commented on What is up with RavenDB 2.0?</title><description>@Rob I have been using RavenDb since v1 and can tell you that v2 is an amazing leap forward for the product. The performance is great when dealing with Maps. If you are developing in the .Net sphere, then RavenDB is the definite winner in my book. The only thing that might keep you from choosing RavenDB is cost vs. Free.

If I had one thing I would wish for is to kill the silverlight admin and move to HTML5 based admin. Tired of seeing Silverlight crashes due to VMWare.</description><link>http://ayende.com/160129/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0#comment5</link><guid>http://ayende.com/160129/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0#comment5</guid><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 20:03:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Andrew commented on What is up with RavenDB 2.0?</title><description>A MongoDB vs RavenDB write-up would be very interesting.</description><link>http://ayende.com/160129/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0#comment4</link><guid>http://ayende.com/160129/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0#comment4</guid><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 18:18:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ryan commented on What is up with RavenDB 2.0?</title><description>I'll third that motion. We are using Mongo internally for several small apps, but I really like what I see with Raven. It would be nice to see a comparison of the two.</description><link>http://ayende.com/160129/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0#comment3</link><guid>http://ayende.com/160129/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0#comment3</guid><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 17:21:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Rob Macdonald Smith commented on What is up with RavenDB 2.0?</title><description>I agree with Eric J Smith - I am at the point where I am choosing a document store, and I love what I see here for Raven, but pulled by Mongo because of the momentum it has.</description><link>http://ayende.com/160129/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0#comment2</link><guid>http://ayende.com/160129/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0#comment2</guid><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:19:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Eric J. Smith commented on What is up with RavenDB 2.0?</title><description>I would really love to see a detailed comparison to MongoDB written up that shows performance and scalibility numbers and why you would pick RavenDB over Mongo. Mongo is the leading document db and I think that represents a great opportunity for you to win people over by provide concrete data and reason why RavenDB is a better choice.</description><link>http://ayende.com/160129/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0#comment1</link><guid>http://ayende.com/160129/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0#comment1</guid><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:59:49 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>