﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Ayende @ Rahien</title><link>http://ayende.com</link><description>Ayende @ Rahien</description><copyright>Copyright (C) Ayende Rahien  2004 - 2021 (c) 2026</copyright><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>Alexey commented on What is up with RavenDB 2.0? Performance&amp;hellip;</title><description>Have you full source code for this perf test?</description><link>http://ayende.com/160033/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0-performance#comment19</link><guid>http://ayende.com/160033/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0-performance#comment19</guid><pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 13:07:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Alexei K commented on What is up with RavenDB 2.0? Performance&amp;hellip;</title><description>So, how did the older version do on this? What's the improvement (if any) does 2.0 bring?</description><link>http://ayende.com/160033/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0-performance#comment18</link><guid>http://ayende.com/160033/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0-performance#comment18</guid><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 17:18:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Sean Kearon commented on What is up with RavenDB 2.0? Performance&amp;hellip;</title><description>Very nice!  What do the indexes look like?</description><link>http://ayende.com/160033/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0-performance#comment17</link><guid>http://ayende.com/160033/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0-performance#comment17</guid><pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 16:24:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Catalin Pop commented on What is up with RavenDB 2.0? Performance&amp;hellip;</title><description>@Daniel
Bulk loading should include indexing. In my earlier example, indexing during bulk load is enabled.
</description><link>http://ayende.com/160033/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0-performance#comment16</link><guid>http://ayende.com/160033/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0-performance#comment16</guid><pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 11:36:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Daniel Lang commented on What is up with RavenDB 2.0? Performance&amp;hellip;</title><description>AndersM: My point is - the only metric I care about is the time it takes to do both, writing _and_ indexing. No, I don't mean bulk import of data-sets because this is something you don't do frequently and when you do it, it's generally not time sensitive (like migrate from another database).</description><link>http://ayende.com/160033/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0-performance#comment15</link><guid>http://ayende.com/160033/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0-performance#comment15</guid><pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 10:43:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Guillaume commented on What is up with RavenDB 2.0? Performance&amp;hellip;</title><description>&gt;AndersM, Not really, just loading the data and waiting for indexing, and loading the data with indexing would result in about the same time frame

Maybe in the Ravendb world...
As Will Hughes suggested, it would be more interesting to see the difference with the previous release, right now it's just some random numbers.

</description><link>http://ayende.com/160033/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0-performance#comment14</link><guid>http://ayende.com/160033/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0-performance#comment14</guid><pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 09:51:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>AndersM commented on What is up with RavenDB 2.0? Performance&amp;hellip;</title><description>Ok, i did not know how Raven would handle this, but answered based on Daniels numbers :)</description><link>http://ayende.com/160033/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0-performance#comment13</link><guid>http://ayende.com/160033/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0-performance#comment13</guid><pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 09:45:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ayende Rahien commented on What is up with RavenDB 2.0? Performance&amp;hellip;</title><description>AndersM,
Not really, just loading the data and waiting for indexing, and loading the data with indexing would result in about the same time frame</description><link>http://ayende.com/160033/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0-performance#comment12</link><guid>http://ayende.com/160033/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0-performance#comment12</guid><pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 09:12:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>AndersM commented on What is up with RavenDB 2.0? Performance&amp;hellip;</title><description>Daniel: Of course it matters, Jamie clearly stated why. If you need to store large amounts of data quickly, and only need indexes later, bulking makes sense.</description><link>http://ayende.com/160033/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0-performance#comment11</link><guid>http://ayende.com/160033/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0-performance#comment11</guid><pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 09:10:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Daniel Lang commented on What is up with RavenDB 2.0? Performance&amp;hellip;</title><description>I really don't understand why people care so much about 'bulk load' performance. I mean really, what's the difference between writing 1.000 or 5.000 documents per second WITHOUT indexing? 

The whole point about raven is that is has indexes for you to do calculation or queries. If you don't need that, you have a key/value store for which you don't need raven in the first place. 

Perf metrics without indexing are useless.</description><link>http://ayende.com/160033/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0-performance#comment10</link><guid>http://ayende.com/160033/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0-performance#comment10</guid><pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 08:29:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ayende Rahien commented on What is up with RavenDB 2.0? Performance&amp;hellip;</title><description>The "ETL code" is just the smuggler.</description><link>http://ayende.com/160033/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0-performance#comment9</link><guid>http://ayende.com/160033/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0-performance#comment9</guid><pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 23:41:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ayende Rahien commented on What is up with RavenDB 2.0? Performance&amp;hellip;</title><description>Jamie,
We will have bulk load work done after the release. It is a bit involved, as you might imagine.</description><link>http://ayende.com/160033/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0-performance#comment8</link><guid>http://ayende.com/160033/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0-performance#comment8</guid><pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 23:41:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Will Hughes commented on What is up with RavenDB 2.0? Performance&amp;hellip;</title><description>Is it possible to get a comparison with Raven 1.x's performance using the same dataset and hardware? </description><link>http://ayende.com/160033/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0-performance#comment7</link><guid>http://ayende.com/160033/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0-performance#comment7</guid><pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 22:13:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Nabil commented on What is up with RavenDB 2.0? Performance&amp;hellip;</title><description>Would be great if you could direct us to your ETL process. I noticed the old ETL project in the raven source is no longer there?</description><link>http://ayende.com/160033/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0-performance#comment6</link><guid>http://ayende.com/160033/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0-performance#comment6</guid><pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 20:51:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Remco Ros commented on What is up with RavenDB 2.0? Performance&amp;hellip;</title><description>@Jeús http://www.imdb.com/interfaces</description><link>http://ayende.com/160033/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0-performance#comment5</link><guid>http://ayende.com/160033/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0-performance#comment5</guid><pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 19:23:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Jeús López commented on What is up with RavenDB 2.0? Performance&amp;hellip;</title><description>May I ask where you downloaded the IMDB dataset from?</description><link>http://ayende.com/160033/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0-performance#comment4</link><guid>http://ayende.com/160033/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0-performance#comment4</guid><pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 16:43:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Jamie commented on What is up with RavenDB 2.0? Performance&amp;hellip;</title><description>What options do you have for doing an actual bulk load? Say if we wanted to load 250m moderately complex documents - is there some kind of bulk load option which can do batch indexing after?</description><link>http://ayende.com/160033/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0-performance#comment3</link><guid>http://ayende.com/160033/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0-performance#comment3</guid><pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 16:42:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ayende Rahien commented on What is up with RavenDB 2.0? Performance&amp;hellip;</title><description>Pop,
This is meant to show indexing performance more than anything else.
Bulk load is doing something quite different.</description><link>http://ayende.com/160033/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0-performance#comment2</link><guid>http://ayende.com/160033/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0-performance#comment2</guid><pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 16:32:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Pop Catalin commented on What is up with RavenDB 2.0? Performance&amp;hellip;</title><description>"Loading 4.66 millions records in 44 minutes"

This means 1756 documents / second.

Is the I/O channel saturated from this? Disk write speed maxed out?

I don't know about the complexity of those documents, however an ETL process can reach over 50k "rows" per second on my modest machine using bulk load.

Therefore I think it would be interesting to see some benchmarks for small documents (1 property), medium (10-100 properties) large (1000+ properties) and the I/O caracteristics of Raven DB during such operations.

</description><link>http://ayende.com/160033/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0-performance#comment1</link><guid>http://ayende.com/160033/what-is-up-with-ravendb-2-0-performance#comment1</guid><pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 16:23:23 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>