﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Ayende @ Rahien</title><link>http://ayende.com</link><description>Ayende @ Rahien</description><copyright>Copyright (C) Ayende Rahien  2004 - 2021 (c) 2026</copyright><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>dotnetchris commented on NuGet Perf, Part VI AKA how to be the most popular dev around</title><description>@Judah i responded to that tweet</description><link>http://ayende.com/158241/nuget-perf-part-vi-aka-how-to-be-the-most-popular-dev-around#comment14</link><guid>http://ayende.com/158241/nuget-perf-part-vi-aka-how-to-be-the-most-popular-dev-around#comment14</guid><pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 15:05:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Judah Gabriel Himango commented on NuGet Perf, Part VI AKA how to be the most popular dev around</title><description>Fair enough.

Tangential: Did you see @kellabyte twitter feed last night? She doesn't like that Raven calls itself ACID. https://twitter.com/JudahGabriel/status/242880337410150400</description><link>http://ayende.com/158241/nuget-perf-part-vi-aka-how-to-be-the-most-popular-dev-around#comment13</link><guid>http://ayende.com/158241/nuget-perf-part-vi-aka-how-to-be-the-most-popular-dev-around#comment13</guid><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 15:32:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ayende Rahien commented on NuGet Perf, Part VI AKA how to be the most popular dev around</title><description>Judah,
Temp indexes can come &amp; go.
Also, temp indexes don't do analyzed, only full term comparisons.</description><link>http://ayende.com/158241/nuget-perf-part-vi-aka-how-to-be-the-most-popular-dev-around#comment12</link><guid>http://ayende.com/158241/nuget-perf-part-vi-aka-how-to-be-the-most-popular-dev-around#comment12</guid><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 14:49:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Judah Gabriel Himango commented on NuGet Perf, Part VI AKA how to be the most popular dev around</title><description>Oren,

Very cool! Feature indeed.

Can I ask why we require static indexes in order to use .Suggest?

I am giving a Raven talk at Twin Cities Code Camp, and I'm bummed that I have to first explain static vs dynamic indexes before ever touching on this cool .Suggest feature. </description><link>http://ayende.com/158241/nuget-perf-part-vi-aka-how-to-be-the-most-popular-dev-around#comment11</link><guid>http://ayende.com/158241/nuget-perf-part-vi-aka-how-to-be-the-most-popular-dev-around#comment11</guid><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 14:45:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ayende Rahien commented on NuGet Perf, Part VI AKA how to be the most popular dev around</title><description>Igor,
Totally different things all together.</description><link>http://ayende.com/158241/nuget-perf-part-vi-aka-how-to-be-the-most-popular-dev-around#comment10</link><guid>http://ayende.com/158241/nuget-perf-part-vi-aka-how-to-be-the-most-popular-dev-around#comment10</guid><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 14:11:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Igor Kalders commented on NuGet Perf, Part VI AKA how to be the most popular dev around</title><description>Watch your step. Since Google buys at least one company a week, you might be overtaken shortly. Does is actually make sense to compare BigTable to RavenDB?</description><link>http://ayende.com/158241/nuget-perf-part-vi-aka-how-to-be-the-most-popular-dev-around#comment9</link><guid>http://ayende.com/158241/nuget-perf-part-vi-aka-how-to-be-the-most-popular-dev-around#comment9</guid><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 14:09:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ayende Rahien commented on NuGet Perf, Part VI AKA how to be the most popular dev around</title><description>Felipe,
Lucene.NET is fairly active.
It just went 3.0.3, I think.
We didn't try to submit an upstream java patch, just one to the C# port.</description><link>http://ayende.com/158241/nuget-perf-part-vi-aka-how-to-be-the-most-popular-dev-around#comment8</link><guid>http://ayende.com/158241/nuget-perf-part-vi-aka-how-to-be-the-most-popular-dev-around#comment8</guid><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 13:04:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Felipe Fujiy Pessoto commented on NuGet Perf, Part VI AKA how to be the most popular dev around</title><description>Lucene.net accepts C# contrib? Or do you need to write in Java and send to original Lucene?

Lucene.net is still active? The last version is 2.9.4, and the original Lucene has 3.0 to 3.6 stable versions and a 4.0 Beta.</description><link>http://ayende.com/158241/nuget-perf-part-vi-aka-how-to-be-the-most-popular-dev-around#comment7</link><guid>http://ayende.com/158241/nuget-perf-part-vi-aka-how-to-be-the-most-popular-dev-around#comment7</guid><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 13:02:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ayende Rahien commented on NuGet Perf, Part VI AKA how to be the most popular dev around</title><description>Simon,
Yes.</description><link>http://ayende.com/158241/nuget-perf-part-vi-aka-how-to-be-the-most-popular-dev-around#comment6</link><guid>http://ayende.com/158241/nuget-perf-part-vi-aka-how-to-be-the-most-popular-dev-around#comment6</guid><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 12:30:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Simon Skov Boisen commented on NuGet Perf, Part VI AKA how to be the most popular dev around</title><description>Awesome that you helped improve Lucene in order bring great features to RavenDB, is it Lucene.net your using?</description><link>http://ayende.com/158241/nuget-perf-part-vi-aka-how-to-be-the-most-popular-dev-around#comment5</link><guid>http://ayende.com/158241/nuget-perf-part-vi-aka-how-to-be-the-most-popular-dev-around#comment5</guid><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 12:28:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ayende Rahien commented on NuGet Perf, Part VI AKA how to be the most popular dev around</title><description>Simon,
We rely on Lucene for some stuff, in this case, it is actually RavenDB that submitted patches to get this feature working properly.</description><link>http://ayende.com/158241/nuget-perf-part-vi-aka-how-to-be-the-most-popular-dev-around#comment4</link><guid>http://ayende.com/158241/nuget-perf-part-vi-aka-how-to-be-the-most-popular-dev-around#comment4</guid><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 12:10:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Simon Skov Boisen commented on NuGet Perf, Part VI AKA how to be the most popular dev around</title><description>Awesome stuff though it's worth mentioning that it is not so much RavenDB as it is Lucene that makes the search correction possible. Correct?</description><link>http://ayende.com/158241/nuget-perf-part-vi-aka-how-to-be-the-most-popular-dev-around#comment3</link><guid>http://ayende.com/158241/nuget-perf-part-vi-aka-how-to-be-the-most-popular-dev-around#comment3</guid><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 12:04:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Pure Krome commented on NuGet Perf, Part VI AKA how to be the most popular dev around</title><description>This needs a meme because RavenDb kick ass!

http://cdn.memegenerator.net/instances/400x/26194023.jpg

</description><link>http://ayende.com/158241/nuget-perf-part-vi-aka-how-to-be-the-most-popular-dev-around#comment2</link><guid>http://ayende.com/158241/nuget-perf-part-vi-aka-how-to-be-the-most-popular-dev-around#comment2</guid><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 11:41:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Andreas Kroll commented on NuGet Perf, Part VI AKA how to be the most popular dev around</title><description>How would you say it? "It just works!"

Awesome. Not only does the NOSQL approach bring massive performance gains, but also additional and useful benefits from using lucene as query language. 

I don't know if the NuGet data is hosted on a single SQL machine, but I think you should also show how easy it would be to load-balance over multiple servers with replication.
If I understood RavenDB correctly the replication is more or less a configuration item stored in the database itself. 

Thanks for the "real life" example. I think this is where developers can see the real gain of using RavenDB. </description><link>http://ayende.com/158241/nuget-perf-part-vi-aka-how-to-be-the-most-popular-dev-around#comment1</link><guid>http://ayende.com/158241/nuget-perf-part-vi-aka-how-to-be-the-most-popular-dev-around#comment1</guid><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 11:02:48 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>