Ayende @ Rahien

My name is Oren Eini
Founder of Hibernating Rhinos LTD and RavenDB.
You can reach me by phone or email:


+972 52-548-6969

, @ Q c

Posts: 6,026 | Comments: 44,842

filter by tags archive

Dreaming in Code: Multi Linq

time to read 1 min | 137 words

I was asked how we will approach the same Multi Query approach with Linq integration, here are some thoughts about it.

var posts = from post in data.Posts
            where post.User.Name == "Ayende"
		orderby post.PublishedDate desc;
var postsCount = posts.Count();

new LinqQueryBatch()
 .Execute();//perform the query

foreach(Post p in posts)//no query
//no query
Console.WriteLine("Overall posts by Ayende: {0}", postsCount.Single() );

The LinqQueryBatch in this case doesn't need to pass delegates to process the results, it can modify the Linq Query directly, so trying to find the result will find the one that was already loaded when we executed the multi query.

Again, this is something that I am merely thinking about, no concrete code created.


Jeff Brown

It's a good start.

Hmm... Won't "posts.Count()" force posts to be evaluated? It doesn't just wrap "posts" with a new "IEnumerable" which can be evaluated on demand. It really wants to return an "int" immediately. That's the kind of thing I was worried about with Multi-LINQ.

I suppose we can define Count() in a non-standard way to return an IEnumerable instead. Looks like that's what you're doing up there actually. Just not sure whether it'll play nice with standard LINQ idioms.

(I hope this doesn't turn into another one of those irritating syntax gotchas in C# like with event raising in Rhino.Mocks...)

Ayende Rahien

Jeff, I agree, but I don't see any other option to do it, frankly.

I would have returned an Int32Proxy, but that is not something that is possible :-)

Matt Warren

If your Add method took a lambda expression you could have your Count query w/o executing it prematurely.

new LinqQueryBatch()

.Add( () => posts)

.Add( () => posts.Count() )


However, it would possibly cleaner to simply have an execute method that took one or more lambda's to execute.

LinqQueryBatch.Execute( () => posts, () => posts.Count() );

Ayende Rahien

Theoretically, yes.

But consider complex expressions, that is not something that I would like to do inline

Comment preview

Comments have been closed on this topic.


No future posts left, oh my!


  1. Technical observations from my wife (3):
    13 Nov 2015 - Production issues
  2. Production postmortem (13):
    13 Nov 2015 - The case of the “it is slow on that machine (only)”
  3. Speaking (5):
    09 Nov 2015 - Community talk in Kiev, Ukraine–What does it take to be a good developer
  4. Find the bug (5):
    11 Sep 2015 - The concurrent memory buster
  5. Buffer allocation strategies (3):
    09 Sep 2015 - Bad usage patterns
View all series


Main feed Feed Stats
Comments feed   Comments Feed Stats