Ayende @ Rahien

Hi!
My name is Oren Eini
Founder of Hibernating Rhinos LTD and RavenDB.
You can reach me by phone or email:

ayende@ayende.com

+972 52-548-6969

, @ Q c

Posts: 18 | Comments: 69

filter by tags archive

Dreaming in Code: Multi Linq

time to read 1 min | 137 words

I was asked how we will approach the same Multi Query approach with Linq integration, here are some thoughts about it.

var posts = from post in data.Posts
            where post.User.Name == "Ayende"
		orderby post.PublishedDate desc;
var postsCount = posts.Count();
posts.Skip(10).Take(15);

new LinqQueryBatch()
 .Add(posts)
 .Add(postsCount)
 .Execute();//perform the query

foreach(Post p in posts)//no query
{
  Console.WriteLine(p.ToString());
}
//no query
Console.WriteLine("Overall posts by Ayende: {0}", postsCount.Single() );

The LinqQueryBatch in this case doesn't need to pass delegates to process the results, it can modify the Linq Query directly, so trying to find the result will find the one that was already loaded when we executed the multi query.

Again, this is something that I am merely thinking about, no concrete code created.


Comments

Jeff Brown

It's a good start.

Hmm... Won't "posts.Count()" force posts to be evaluated? It doesn't just wrap "posts" with a new "IEnumerable" which can be evaluated on demand. It really wants to return an "int" immediately. That's the kind of thing I was worried about with Multi-LINQ.

I suppose we can define Count() in a non-standard way to return an IEnumerable instead. Looks like that's what you're doing up there actually. Just not sure whether it'll play nice with standard LINQ idioms.

(I hope this doesn't turn into another one of those irritating syntax gotchas in C# like with event raising in Rhino.Mocks...)

Ayende Rahien

Jeff, I agree, but I don't see any other option to do it, frankly.

I would have returned an Int32Proxy, but that is not something that is possible :-)

Matt Warren

If your Add method took a lambda expression you could have your Count query w/o executing it prematurely.

new LinqQueryBatch()

.Add( () => posts)

.Add( () => posts.Count() )

.Execute();

However, it would possibly cleaner to simply have an execute method that took one or more lambda's to execute.

LinqQueryBatch.Execute( () => posts, () => posts.Count() );

Ayende Rahien

Theoretically, yes.

But consider complex expressions, that is not something that I would like to do inline

Comment preview

Comments have been closed on this topic.

FUTURE POSTS

  1. RavenDB 3.0 New Stable Release - one day from now
  2. Production postmortem: The industry at large - about one day from now
  3. The insidious cost of allocations - 3 days from now
  4. Buffer allocation strategies: A possible solution - 6 days from now
  5. Buffer allocation strategies: Explaining the solution - 7 days from now

And 3 more posts are pending...

There are posts all the way to Sep 11, 2015

RECENT SERIES

  1. Find the bug (5):
    20 Apr 2011 - Why do I get a Null Reference Exception?
  2. Production postmortem (10):
    01 Sep 2015 - The case of the lying configuration file
  3. What is new in RavenDB 3.5 (7):
    12 Aug 2015 - Monitoring support
  4. Career planning (6):
    24 Jul 2015 - The immortal choices aren't
View all series

Syndication

Main feed Feed Stats
Comments feed   Comments Feed Stats