Recently I have posted a few contentional posts, to which some people responded by explaining me the same reasoning that I talked about in the post. I would like to point out that if I already detailed the problem in the post, I am probably aware of it, and I think that this is the wrong approach despite those reasons.

There is a difference between understanding the reasoning behind something, and agreeing with it. I can follow the argument to its logical conclusion, and still not agree with the end result.