Ayende @ Rahien

Hi!
My name is Oren Eini
Founder of Hibernating Rhinos LTD and RavenDB.
You can reach me by phone or email:

ayende@ayende.com

+972 52-548-6969

, @ Q c

Posts: 10 | Comments: 35

filter by tags archive

More xUnit tweaks, dynamic test skipping

time to read 1 min | 99 words

For a long time, xUnit’s dev has resisted adding support for skipping a test dynamically. You could create your own Fact class and handle that yourself, but that was quite a lot of work, for something very specific.

In RavenDB, we had the need to dynamically decide whatever the test can run based on the actual test situation, so I decided to add this to our xUnit fork. This turned out to be really simple to do. Just three lines of code Smile

https://github.com/ayende/xunit/commit/82accb4c850a3938187ac334fb73d6e81dc921e3#diff-3c2b9f2cb8392f32456d0bf81151b59fR57


Comments

Chris Marisic

I really like xUnit, but some of their dogmatic choices really irritate me. This is one of those times they choose to be dogmatic over actually getting shit done.

They make users jump through hoops just so they can stay on their high and mighty horse.

I wonder how many contributors to xUnit have all built the very same things they refuse to allow into the project in their own real systems. I suspect it would be more than half.

chris mckelt

I went the attribute based approach inheriting from [Fact].

This way I had a global setting to run/ignore tests marked with the [OptionallyIgnoreTestFact] attribute at run-time.
https://github.com/chrismckelt/XUnit.OptionallyIgnore

Scooletz

@ChrisMarisic, +1 against xUnit dogmatism. For example, Assert with a message http://xunit.codeplex.com/workitem/4638 That's why I prefer to stick to NUnit. It's simple and let's you express in your own way.

Chris Marisic

@Scooletz it's crazy to me to see the xUnit official response was basically "you suck". Providing additional context is ALWAYS A win. Boggles my mind to see people opposed to additional context. Everything is meaningless without context.

Chris Marisic

edit if slorion isn't your codeplex account, replace "you" with "slorion"

Comment preview

Comments have been closed on this topic.

FUTURE POSTS

  1. Production postmortem: The case of the memory eater and high load - 2 days from now
  2. Production postmortem: The case of the lying configuration file - 3 days from now
  3. Production postmortem: The industry at large - 4 days from now
  4. The insidious cost of allocations - 5 days from now
  5. Find the bug: The concurrent memory buster - 6 days from now

And 4 more posts are pending...

There are posts all the way to Sep 10, 2015

RECENT SERIES

  1. Find the bug (5):
    20 Apr 2011 - Why do I get a Null Reference Exception?
  2. Production postmortem (10):
    14 Aug 2015 - The case of the man in the middle
  3. What is new in RavenDB 3.5 (7):
    12 Aug 2015 - Monitoring support
  4. Career planning (6):
    24 Jul 2015 - The immortal choices aren't
View all series

Syndication

Main feed Feed Stats
Comments feed   Comments Feed Stats