Ayende @ Rahien

Refunds available at head office

More xUnit tweaks, dynamic test skipping

For a long time, xUnit’s dev has resisted adding support for skipping a test dynamically. You could create your own Fact class and handle that yourself, but that was quite a lot of work, for something very specific.

In RavenDB, we had the need to dynamically decide whatever the test can run based on the actual test situation, so I decided to add this to our xUnit fork. This turned out to be really simple to do. Just three lines of code Smile

https://github.com/ayende/xunit/commit/82accb4c850a3938187ac334fb73d6e81dc921e3#diff-3c2b9f2cb8392f32456d0bf81151b59fR57

Comments

Chris Marisic
03/19/2014 09:08 PM by
Chris Marisic

I really like xUnit, but some of their dogmatic choices really irritate me. This is one of those times they choose to be dogmatic over actually getting shit done.

They make users jump through hoops just so they can stay on their high and mighty horse.

I wonder how many contributors to xUnit have all built the very same things they refuse to allow into the project in their own real systems. I suspect it would be more than half.

chris mckelt
03/19/2014 09:40 PM by
chris mckelt

I went the attribute based approach inheriting from [Fact].

This way I had a global setting to run/ignore tests marked with the [OptionallyIgnoreTestFact] attribute at run-time.
https://github.com/chrismckelt/XUnit.OptionallyIgnore

Scooletz
03/20/2014 12:57 PM by
Scooletz

@ChrisMarisic, +1 against xUnit dogmatism. For example, Assert with a message http://xunit.codeplex.com/workitem/4638 That's why I prefer to stick to NUnit. It's simple and let's you express in your own way.

Chris Marisic
03/20/2014 02:12 PM by
Chris Marisic

@Scooletz it's crazy to me to see the xUnit official response was basically "you suck". Providing additional context is ALWAYS A win. Boggles my mind to see people opposed to additional context. Everything is meaningless without context.

Chris Marisic
03/20/2014 02:13 PM by
Chris Marisic

edit if slorion isn't your codeplex account, replace "you" with "slorion"

Comments have been closed on this topic.