Ayende @ Rahien

My name is Oren Eini
Founder of Hibernating Rhinos LTD and RavenDB.
You can reach me by phone or email:


+972 52-548-6969

, @ Q c

Posts: 6,026 | Comments: 44,842

filter by tags archive

RavenDB vNext? Just the same, a little bit better, all over the place

time to read 1 min | 158 words

We pretty much completed all of the major work that was going to get into the next major RavenDB release. There is the indexing stuff that I already talked about in this blog, but most of the rest are a lot of seemingly minor things. Nothing that would blow you head in isolation.

Things like better aggressive caching invalidation, faster error in network timeout scenarios, better bucket selection algorithm for map/reduce, providing you with auto resolving conflicts, or even more improvements to the studio.

Hell, it is even things like this:


We output a lot of information that can help you figure out what is going on in your system. But now we are actually starting to take it up a notch and also provide good UX for handling that.



Pretty! It's great to have that kind of feedback on internal stuff.

So far, is moving 2.1 to 2.5 supposed to be seamless? Love all the 2.5 features but want to wait a bit until we use it as our main version.


Hi Oren,

I love your posts, but as I'm not a RavenDB user I would realy love to get the design/testing/architecture posts (not RavenDB relative) on a different rss feed :)


Rob Ashton

All the topics have their own RSS feed - you could very easily create a Yahoo pipe that says "the whole feed unless it contains the Raven tag" :-)

If Yahoo pipes still exists that is.

Ayende Rahien

Vlad, 2.5 is 2.1 renamed, and moving from 2.0 to 2.5 is pretty seamless, yes. Note, however, that 2.5 is considered unstable.


I think it's very useful to have performance stats, but it would be even nicer if Raven exposed current performance numbers so they could be queried and stored by external monitoring tools (Cacti, for example) I thought about using NLog for sending out performance information over UDP, this way you could use NLog's configuration to decide which stats should be provided to your reporting tool.

Ayende Rahien

Rafal, If you want the perf monitor values, you can get them using the standard methods. Windows provide many such options. And any monitoring tool can handle that.

Comment preview

Comments have been closed on this topic.


No future posts left, oh my!


  1. Technical observations from my wife (3):
    13 Nov 2015 - Production issues
  2. Production postmortem (13):
    13 Nov 2015 - The case of the “it is slow on that machine (only)”
  3. Speaking (5):
    09 Nov 2015 - Community talk in Kiev, Ukraine–What does it take to be a good developer
  4. Find the bug (5):
    11 Sep 2015 - The concurrent memory buster
  5. Buffer allocation strategies (3):
    09 Sep 2015 - Bad usage patterns
View all series


Main feed Feed Stats
Comments feed   Comments Feed Stats